Non driving gene mutation-ASXL1: I have MF with... - MPN Voice

MPN Voice

10,886 members15,202 posts

Non driving gene mutation-ASXL1

merlisa profile image
11 Replies

I have MF with JAK2 V617F for 10 years, now is taking Ruxotinib and Interferon . Spleen contraction and blood control are good. Although I took a lot of hormones, at least my fibrosis degree has been reversed, and the mutation rate has also decreased a lot. But I was found I have a new bad prognosis gene mutation-ASXL1 with the rate of mutation is 15%~16%. What is the latest international approach to this mutation? I have no donor for stem cell transplantation, and I am extremely worried.

Written by
merlisa profile image
merlisa
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
Read more about...
11 Replies
Aneliv9 profile image
Aneliv9

Hello. This mutation is a new finding??? Is it a result/ effect from previous drugs (ruxolitinib and interferon)?

Also isn't it possible to find a donor on worldwide base?

merlisa profile image
merlisa in reply toAneliv9

As I know, no drug for asxl1.

EPguy profile image
EPguy

Good to have such Jak2 reductions, and fibrosis reversal is great.

Did you have a test for ASXL1 before the recent new finding?

On ASXL1 latest info you ask about, some reports here. The nearest term agent may be Navitoclax combo with Rux, in trials, see last item.

--

They are learning new details how ASXL1 works and with that they have a new idea to address it.

"...identified a first-in-class small molecule inhibitor that was able to inhibit BAP1 activity...they discovered that blocking BAP1 activity reduced the expression of genes upregulated due to ASXL1 mutations, ultimately suppressing tumor progression."

It seems for the 1st time there is a potential way to treat ASXL1. But it's still new research.

news.feinberg.northwestern....

--

Here is a more specific report regarding ABT-737, a bit further along but still pre-clinical. ABT-737 has been known for some time:

"we provide preclinical evidence showing that the combination of ruxolitinib and ABT-737 is a promising therapeutic strategy for MPN patients with concurrent JAK2V617F and ASXL1 mutations"

researchgate.net/publicatio...

--

Going further, ABT-737 seems to have evolved into orally available Navitoclax, which is in clinical trials in combo with Rux.

news.abbvie.com/news/press-...

lakeview65 profile image
lakeview65 in reply toEPguy

Thank you for this information, I will definitely read the studies. I have ET, Jak 2 is 9% alle burden and my Askl1 is 32% alle burden . I have been told that this is my driver mutation, not the Jak2. I talk to my MpN Dr and no one seems to know what this will mean for my future. Hopefully they will learn more in the future. I am on Hydroxyurea, for now. I have no side effects, maybe a bit of fatigue.

EPguy profile image
EPguy in reply tolakeview65

The Navitoclax study is recruiting for phase 3:

trial.autocruitment.com/mye...

merlisa profile image
merlisa in reply toEPguy

Thanks for your information. It seems to be a new drug, and now in clinical phase 3, it is still targeted at the JAK-STAT pathway, not the gene AXSL1.

EPguy profile image
EPguy in reply tomerlisa

It is a confusing history. But if we coordinate the info here it leads to Navitoclax + Rux being of interest for Jak2 + ASXL1.

--

ABT-737 + Rux is active against these combined mutations:

"In conclusion, we provide preclinical evidence showing that the combination of ruxolitinib and ABT-737 is a promising therapeutic strategy for MPN patients with concurrent JAK2V617F and ASXL1 mutations."

ABT-737 is identical in function to Navitoclax:

"Navitoclax, previously known as ABT-263, is an orally bioavailable analog of ABT-737 with identical function"

--

However, you're right the Navitoclax trial is not directed to ASXL1, and so the trial is not following up on the connections above.

It could be they have found otherwise in their more recent experience, but the benefit seen is in a very fresh (Aug 2022) report. Maybe this result is so new that it cannot be added to the trial. But it should be knowable retrospectively at least as the trial proceeds.

If I had these mutations and qualified for the trial I would provide the info here and inquire in detail with the trial sponsors for their take on the ASXL1 implication, it does seem to lead that way.

merlisa profile image
merlisa in reply toEPguy

Hope ABT-263 could works on AXSL1. Your information is very valuable.

merlisa profile image
merlisa in reply tolakeview65

How many years have you known this result(AXSL1 :32% and JAK 2 9%) and kept it?

SoledadBarcelona profile image
SoledadBarcelona

This is new or you have been it for years?

lakeview65 profile image
lakeview65

I have known this from when I was first diagnosed 18 months ago .

Not what you're looking for?

You may also like...

AXSL1 gene mutation

Hello Everyone, I have pmf-MF with JAK2 mutation and have been taking Rux since the end of 2018....
merlisa profile image

ASXL1 gene detected

Hey guys... :) Trust you are all coping well with your MPNs, and if you are not... then I hope you...
socrates_8 profile image

Jak2 mutation!

Morning all, i’m Back after 3 weeks to see my Haemotologist on Monday, he’s questioning the results...
Trocken profile image

New mutation

Morning all I haven’t posted for a while as have been struggling along nicely on peg ...... My...
Graham7694 profile image

JAK2 mutation = MPN????

I am totally confused by an article I read in the MPN Research Foundation’s Spring newsletter & was...
ERei profile image

Moderation team

Debinha profile image
DebinhaAdministrator
Mazcd profile image
MazcdPartner

Content on HealthUnlocked does not replace the relationship between you and doctors or other healthcare professionals nor the advice you receive from them.

Never delay seeking advice or dialling emergency services because of something that you have read on HealthUnlocked.