I think it's good to see these points being made here, to an audience who weren't particularly after a dry story about how science and health news is reported.
I wonder if they made a conscious decision not to link to the articles and if so, what the reasoning was.
You could find the article yourself and check the headlines, bearing in mind that sometimes they are changed and sometimes are different online than on paper. This website allows you to check for edits to websites, by archiving pages and allowing you to search for past versions of the URL: archive.org/web/
All papers have big enough pages - some papers devote their entire front page to health-scare headlines over 4-5 decks! Quark/InDesign/Whatever makes this very easy.
In fact, most Mail headlines in print turn into essays for the online version - a clever trick of SEO (search engine optimization) to attract more visitors and thereby more advertising revenue.
Though it is important to state that most journalists don't to get to write their own headlines - that is normally down to the sub-editors - who are usually more than happy to sacrifice accuracy in the interests of impact
Still, that's no excuse for the Mail today failing to realise that heart attacks are not the same as heart failure
Content on HealthUnlocked does not replace the relationship between you and doctors or other healthcare professionals nor the advice you receive from them.
Never delay seeking advice or dialling emergency services because of something that you have read on HealthUnlocked.