If you are questioning a 'FND'/'conve... - Functional Neurol...

Functional Neurological Disorder - FND Hope

5,838 members3,096 posts

If you are questioning a 'FND'/'conversion disorder' dx, it's worth asking your doctor to 'think rare'.

210272 profile image
6 Replies

Many rare conditions are multi-system/multi-symptom and even conditions that are more straightforwards are often misdiagnosed as 'functional' (or whatever term is trending at the time). If you think you may have been misdiagnosed with 'FND', it's worth showing this to your doctor and asking them to reconsider your diagnosis and 'dare to think rare'.

mdpi.com/2227-9032/7/4/114/htm

You can also ask for them to explain the rationale behind your 'FND' dx and which criteria were used in the making of the dx.

Written by
210272 profile image
210272
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
6 Replies
Shelford24 profile image
Shelford24

What can you do if they refuse to respond and explain the criteria they used and the rationale behind it?

The complaints procedure has been exhausted.

210272 profile image
210272 in reply to Shelford24

I think that's a question for the admins or Hon Prof Stone. The UK NHS complaints 'procedure' should come with a government health warning. I guess you could contact the Parliamentary Health Service Ombudsperson but they were not deemed fit for purpose when I was invited to send a report to them. Things may have changed, tho'. Hope you're doing OK.

Shelford24 profile image
Shelford24 in reply to 210272

Thanks, maybe legal action may prompt a response?!

It's very odd that the FND dx can be made but the rationale can never be questioned, which will lead to more people being misdiagnosed.

I'm good thanks, hope all is good with you.

210272 profile image
210272 in reply to Shelford24

It may, but the response might be to diagnose you with 'litigation disorder' *Sigh*.I think the article in the BMJ by Hon Prof Stone et al makes it clear that everyone needs to understand the rationale for the dx. It's a bit of a mess tho' cos the people who control the narrative have now shifted the focus to 'internal inconsistencies' as being the 'hallmark' of FND without citing the origin of that hypothesis. I think Jon Stone's self help site was due for a reboot so I would expect to see the 'internal inconsistencies' deal as a banner headline there, when the reboot happens.

Again, I'd turn to the admins here for some answers.

I'm good too, thanks :)

Mic67 profile image
Mic67

Really good article, thanks!

210272 profile image
210272 in reply to Mic67

My pleasure, Mic67 :)

Not what you're looking for?

You may also like...

Alternatives to FND diagnosis - maybe helpful???

Hello Everyone, I am writing this in case it helps anyone. I was diagnosed with auto immune...

How do you get referred to the best FND specialist in the country If you are out of the area? I am willing to travel!

I was diagnosed with FND March this year but my neurologist has retired and not really set a proper...

How do we report misdiagnosis with 'FND' or when the diagnosis hasn't been made for the acceptable reasons?

When I got re-diagnosed with the rare neuro condition I have, I asked how I could report the...

Another report I've had from someone who was misdiagnosed with 'FND' ...

This report came via a friend and was from someone who has diabetes which often causes problems...

??FND v Ischemic Stroke??

Hi everyone, I’ve had FND now for about 8 years, I’ve been a member for just over 6 years this is...