Credit to the band America, lyrics from the song title "Horse with No Name " (1972 - U.S.)
Community friends.
Letter written today to Beth Rush, Ph.D. of Mayo Clinic in Jacksonville, FL. I believe that I met and spoke with Dr. Rush during FND conference at Emory U. earlier this month.
If I remember correctly, she was instrumental in getting our list of anonymous questions regarding FND into the proper hands. No answers to those yet however, FND.hope advised this week they will be seeking answers.
Dr. Rush was only medical person I remember that spoke on behalf of the needs of our sufferers and our care giving families to whom I again express my endless appreciation.
Dr. Rush is a psychologist but has research credits that include work on "association of C9ORF72 repeat expansion in patients with frontotemporal dementia and /or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and also in making neuro pathological association between cerebellar abnormalities and cognitive impairment in carriers of the C90RF72 mutation."
Big words aside, it occurs to me that she is seeing links between genetics, certain protein expressions in parts of brain (including motor cortex) and their effects on cognitive function. The desert may have a flower blooming for us.
I wrote to remind her of us and to let us know if research spills over or turns focus into the realm of our unknown.
As far as the horse goes...
We continue to encourage it to come out of the desert and find its way into the starting gate for the NEXT race. I did not say the first race as that has already occurred and progress has been duly noted.
I am very heartened by the wide variety of active discussions in the community across the whole spectrum of symptoms, diagnostics, medications and other therapies that may come into play with our disease variations. All options remain open.
NOW, for the no name stuff...
We can each rightfully call what we have by any name we wish to use. We can also associate the name of our choosing with particular test results, symptom profile or success outcomes from treatment or therapy modalities.
But,
I wonder out loud... no, I beg of this community ... to consider one possibility that may work to our advantage as we seek out those willing to research and investigate cause of suffering:
Because of the risk of misdiagnosis of underlying conditions and the possibility that multiple conditions may exist at the same time, would we be better off just saying our diagnosis is incomplete, unknown or uncertain as opposed to letting FND always be the centerpiece around which everything swirls.
I am not asking anyone to give up the FND label. I am saying that it may be more difficult to get researchers focused on the problems and their cause if they first have to contend with all of the precedent theories that have been layered on FND.
Maybe scientific research in our case would be more efficient starting from a blank slate. Start anew with the patient and avoid dealing with how individual physicians gave out this diagnosis. We seek new science here. That is critical strategy.
I know its a risk and we may get nowhere with it but I want to give researchers the most room possible to do their thing. We really need their help.
Thank you for listening. Will never give up.
Dan / Seattle