Previously I mentioned that I am waiting for the results from the Helsinki FMT/PD trial which has completed last summer, but not yet released their results. I wrote to the spokesperson for the trial last year to get an idea of when the study results would be released and he said they were hoping for the release of study results by Fall of last year. Well clearly that did not happen so I wrote to him again last week to see if he had an update.
He just wrote back and said they are still under review by a journal and he doesn't currently know when it will be released, but he mentioned another FMT/PD study that I had heard of quite awhile back, but had forgotten about, the Belgian study that was recently published.
Here is a link to that trial and its results :
thelancet.com/journals/ecli...
This randomized, double blind, placebo controlled trial (RCT) used nasojejunal FMT which is delivered via tube through the nose if I remember correctly. This is a bit surprising as in other FMT studies it appeared to be significantly less effective than colonoscopy delivery and possibly even capsule delivery, but this study was started in 2020 which may be the reason for this delivery method.
This RCT had 46 participants that were divided into two groups, those that received healthy donor FMT and those that received their own FMT as the placebo group. FMT was given only once at the beginning of the RCT. The trial was 12 months long and reviews were done at baseline, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months.
Here is a relevant quote from the RCT :
' Our findings suggested a single FMT induced mild, but long-lasting beneficial effects on motor symptoms in patients with early stage PD. '
My takeaway from this is that although these are quite positive results, the FMT delivery method used in this trial has already been shown to be significantly less effective than other delivery methods and thus likely limited the potential beneficial effects of the FMT in this trial. This trial also added further confirmation to the idea that FMT results can be long lasting, even with just one transplant over a period of a year or more. Although this information is useful, the application of FMT more than one time per year seems likely to be more effective and delivery of the FMT through other more effective methods also seems likely to have better effects. The larger participant cohort of this study compared to the previous studies emanating from China tends to add more confirmation to the results obtained in those trials.
FMT continues to suggest that it is a viable, very safe, adjunctive treatment option for PwP and multiple other diseases and health issues as I discussed here :
healthunlocked.com/cure-par...
I will continue to keep an eye out for the Helsinki trial results and report them here as soon as they come available.
Art