My CLL was diagnosed 2020 at stage 0 and my bloods are all within normal ranges now. My spleen has become very enlarged over the last 6 months so my haematologist is sending me for a splenic biopsy. There has been talk of removing my spleen depending what they find. Has anyone else had this happen? Are there ways to shrink the spleen rather than remove it?
Enlarged spleen CLL stage 0: My CLL was... - CLL Support
Enlarged spleen CLL stage 0
Written by
Redkatt
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
Read more about...
44 Replies
•
AussieNeilPartnerAdministrator
Redkatt, welcome to our community on this your first post. You haven't shared where you live and doing so might help you find a CLL specialist who can give you a second opinion. I'd strongly recommend arranging one, because splenic biopsies are rather rare with CLL and splenectomies even more so, if the swelling is due to CLL, which is extremely commonly the case. CLL treatments for the last couple of decades do very well shrinking spleens and nodes back to normal size. Radiotherapy can also shrink your spleen if that's the only significant way your CLL is impacting your health and it is large enough to be considered doing this without having full treatment. You can check the CLL Society for doctors familiar with managing CLL here: cllsociety.org/newly-diagno...
This site explains more about splenic biopsies; radiopaedia.org/articles/sp...
Having a splenectomy means staying on antibiotics for life, as your spleen provides a reservoir for neutrophils to fight off serious infections. It also provides an emergency reservoir in the event of blood loss or the need for additional platelets, so in general is best retained.
If you live in the USA, you can get access to one free video appointment second opinion through the CLL Society; cllsociety.wpengine.com/pro...
If you share approximately where you live to ask for specialist recommendations, I expect you'll want to lock your post to this community for your privacy
healthunlocked.com/cllsuppo...
Neil
I agree with Neil. I have not heard of anyone here who would need a spleen biopsy. My spleen was massive, 22cm. It was pretty obvious it was due to my CLL. It was back to normal size within 10days from commencing treatment (O+V). I would also advise you to find a CLL specialist. Good luck.
We’re your bloods all normal range when your spleen was enlarged? Mine are all within normal range.
Sometimes CLL doesn't "show up" in blood. There are some of us, who have normal blood tests results but lots of other symptoms. When you have an enlarged spleen and CLL, the CLL is most likely behind it. I am not saying you have to start treatment but having your spleen removed is a big thing. Only a CLL specialist can advise you what the next steps should be and what is behind your enlarged spleen.
So far no symptoms just the enlarged spleen
Redkatt, with all respect, an enlarged spleen IS a symptom of CLL, it is also a listed reason that could trigger treatment. Definitely speak to your CLL doctor and ask for a second opinion.
Thanks Neil. I will get a second opinion. Just a strange scenario as all bloods are within normal ranges but spleen enlarged
Redkatt, Neil has given you excellent advice. When my spleen got very big, I did a lot of research and also concluded that splenectomies were rare with cll. That fact is such common knowledge, it makes one wonder how a hematologist could not know this.
I agree with Neil that you should seek a second opinion. That said, it cant be ruled out that your hematologist thinks there is something different about your spleen from other cases that warrants a spleen biopsy.
So yes, get a second opinion before doing a surgical procedure. But you might first consider discussing this with your hematologist and ask him if he thinks spleen biopsies are warranted in all cll swollen spleen cases or if there is something different about your presentation that explains why you need a biopsy. Swollen spleens are so common in cll cases, and spleen biopsies so uncommon, it seems like there has to be more to it.
If you do get a second opinion, you might also consider asking your current dr and your second opinion doctor to consult with each other to see if they can reach a consensus opinion.
My spleen was very big, but after a few months of ibrutinib it returned to normal size. I saw several Cll specialists during that time and nary a one ever suggested I get a biopsy.
Some versions of CLL don't show up in the blood, but do in lymph nodes/spleen. This is considered an SLL presentation kf the CLL and is even rarer than CLL, which is rare enough as it is. Please consider seeing a CLL specialist before agreeing to a splenectomy. Our particular Non Hodgkins Lymphoma doesn't act like other lymphomas, so a hem-onc that deals mostly with other lymphomas is likely not aware of this. CLL is rare, SLL even rarer, and a hem-onc needs to read the most current literature of about how to treat CLL/SLL.
May I ask, what tests were done to get you this diagnosis? If you got it as a "diagnosis of exclusion" without confirmatory testing, that may explain some confusion. Especially since you state "my bloods are all normal NOW"; what things were abnormal earlier? What testing was done?
CLL was diagnosed with raised lymphocyte levels however these have returned to normal levels now however there are still abnormal lymphocytes in my blood
Maybe it is SLL I have. I had blood tests done to confirm CLL
What markers did your blood tests show? A flow cytometry will show CLL markers if there are enough malignant B cells in your blood. Have you had a CT scan & did it show any enlarged lymph nodes? SLL is diagnosed by a biopsy of lymph nodes because in the early stages a CBC or full blood panel appears normal.
I was diagnosed with SLL, the only lymph nodes affected were deep within the chest cavity. I'd want answers to these questions before considering removal of my spleen, to confirm there was no other explanation for my spleen size. That could just be me of course!
CLL markers were found in my bloods. Recent CT scan showed enlarged spleen
Hi Neil
I had my splenectomy in 2001, before these new fangled drugs came along. I have not been"on antibiotics for life". I have lead a pretty normal existence for two decades after it. However, my bone marrow seems to need a little help these days.
One other point I would like some clarification on...
I have been treated in NZ and France, in both cases the Dr I consult with is backed up by a team of specialists, so you get a second opinion by default. Is this not the case elsewhere? Do Drs in the US, say, operate without consulting their peers?
Keep up the good work!
Do you find that you are more susceptible to infection without your spleen or has it not been that much of a difference?
As I say, 2 decades of normal immediately after, then one winter needed antibiotics three times. Next winter I started on immunoglobulin perfusions and a couple of years later (ie recently) on Zarzio injections to gee up my neutrophil counts. So at this stage my situation is more of a nuisance than anything else. I am not nearly as knowledgeable as others on this site, either about CLL in general or my version in particular. But the splenectomy was not really much of a life changing event.
I have a cousin who lost her spleen 45 years ago Not on ATB and doing fine. No CLL though.
Neil, this board is fortunate to have such a wonderful resource like you to give us excellent insights on CLL issues. I had a few spleen questions myself about some "perceived" spleen problems. , particularly about beer belly bloating - without the beer. LOL
Just an update on where things are at. Spleen biopsy showed that there is Marginal Zone Lymphoma which explains why spleen is very enlarged and why haemoglobin is dropping. Treatment with Rituximab is the recommendation however there are other treatments one being splenectomy. Do you know much about MZL?
Redkatt, What treatment did you settle on?
What was the spleen biopsy like? Did they say it was risky beforehand? I just imagine it can get bloody quickly.
Sorry, I don‘t know anything about MZL.
Spleen biopsy wasn’t the nicest procedure! Very sore after it. There are risks and these were all explained before the procedure. Worth going through with it as it got to the reason for the enlarged spleen and dropping haemoglobin that being MZL.
Having 4 treatments of Rituximab over 4 weeks. First treatment done with no reactions or side effects.
Bummer to hear it hurts after. Was it guided with ultrasound or CT?
Good to hear it went smooth! Hopefully the rest will be just as boring so you can nap or read.
Do you have enlarged lymph nodes? Do you have the SLL version? You shared too little info to form an opinion about what might be happening.
This was exactly my presentation, except that I had fatigue, which was ignored as a symptom.
They told me it was likely I wouldn’t need treatment for years, as they completely missed that my spleen was growing massive. I thought I had it sussed! I was eating healthily with a pretty low white count and they only saw me with 6 monthly phone calls.
I joined a research programme looking at the progress of watch and wait in different people.
A Ct scan showed my spleen was massive. They didn’t inform my team. 6 months later my team nearly had apoplexy when I showed them my scan at my routine appointment! They wanted to start me on treatment and just wanted to do an ultrasound scan before treating me.
My spleen had been clearing up my damaged cells. It was keeping everything under control I think and giving everyone the impression that there was nothing going on.
I was frightened that the team I was with thought that an ultrasound of the spleen was enough to assess tumour bulk load prior to venetoclax. They didn’t even discuss venetoclax with me - it was me who mentioned. And they didn’t think it was suitable. The letter from the hospital then said they had discussed with me that venetoclax was best choice and were going to start it!
I got a second opinion, at a specialist cancer hospital, with a brilliant cll specialist and it was the best thing I ever did.
As the others have said, we are all different. Some people present with large spleen and little else.
It is absolutely NOT current policy to biopsy spleens or remove them anymore. I suppose there are rare exceptions but to be honest, yours sounds like mine.
I had a PET CT scan as my spleen was growing very fast, and lots of blood tests, to rule out a fast growing splenic lymphoma, which they did. During that time my haemoglobin suddenly decreased to 10, and my white cells started to increase rapidly, so my very large spleen, which is an indicator for treatment, was a very good indicator indeed. My spleen had had enough of trying to control it all!
The new treatments, like V and O, and the BTK inhibitors eg Acalabrutinib etc are wonder drugs. They shrink your spleen back to normal.
Splenectomy is a relatively dangerous operation and used to be done years ago, prior to the great new treatments. It was done when the large spleen caused more symptoms than it prevented.
My spleen is normal after a year of venetoclax and obinutuzumab. All my spleen symptoms disappeared within 2 weeks of treatment though!
I echo everyone here, get a second opinion from a cll consultant! Best thing I ever did. Your consultant clearly isn’t.
Good luck! Don’t worry about treatment! Quite honestly it’s brilliant nowadays xx
Your case is so similiar to mine. It makes sense that the spleen is enlarged due to cleaning up all the rogue blood cells. I will be getting a second opinion
Wow. Just a big spleen and nothing else? Remarkable.
Yes I totally thought I had cured myself as my white blood counts went backwards! Was so disillusioned when I found my spleen had been growing secretly lol! But then within months everything went off!
My hematologist has treated my enlarged spleen with radiation to shrink it. I had already started Ibrutinub and my blood work was all normal except for the enlarged spleen.
Please do not have any surgeries until you speak to a CLL specialist. When my husband was first diagnosed we were seeing so many doctors our heads were spinning. We had to pick an oncologists to see the next specialists to get his neck CT done. That doctor was following the oncologists orders who we had not even seen yet. The oncologist ordered an unnecessary neck surgery to remove a lymph node. We saw the CLL specialist 24 hours after the surgery. He was not happy about the surgery. He stated, " I would have never ordered this surgery". So $60,000 dollars later, my husband had an unnecessary surgery. We could have sued, but chose to move on. The hospital has now changed their protocol.
My spleen was also enlarged to 19 cm and hard as a rock before I started treatment but after the first two Gazyva infusions I could no longer feel it.
It is reassuring to know that there are drugs that can return the spleen to its normal size
I was on w&w and stage 0 for many years. My spleen got enlarged so that I could feel it with every step. The only thing different in my life at that time was the stress of someone close almost dying. My spleen went back to normal without any medication or treatment after my stress subsided. We forget that our attitudes matter. I would get a second opinion if he wants to remove the spleen. Good luck
Definitely getting another opinion. Stress is so damaging to our mental and physical health.
Not what you're looking for?
You may also like...
Enlarged spleen
I was diagnosed in 2010 with CLL. no symptoms, WBC around 30, platelets fine, as are red blood...
Enlarged spleen
Quick update since my last post about spleen pain. I went for an ultrasound and my spleen size and...
enlarged spleen
I had an ultrasound today to be told my spleen is quite enlarged. I had no idea the spleen works...
Spleen enlarged
In February 2017 I was diagnosed with CLL and am on watch and wait. WBC is about 66 and other...
Enlarged Spleen
Has anyone who has an enlarged spleen been told to change their diet? I have been researching and...
Enlarged spleen 
significance of enlarged spleen
Watch & Wait - now enlarged spleen
Stage 2, not Stage 0
Bloated tummy and enlarged spleen
