bgb 3111 vs. BR: Anyone in this trial? Thoughts... - CLL Support

CLL Support

23,138 members39,744 posts

bgb 3111 vs. BR

baleman profile image
8 Replies

Anyone in this trial? Thoughts on it in or not in the trial? I have to make a decision on this very soon and appreciate any comments. clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show...

Written by
baleman profile image
baleman
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
8 Replies
Cllcanada profile image
CllcanadaTop Poster CURE Hero

Do you have Imbruvica (ibrutinib) available to you for firstline? If you do, then zanubrutinib vs ibrutinib would be the question...

Without knowing more its very hard to go further...

~chris

baleman profile image
baleman in reply to Cllcanada

not known because I am under 65 without 17p. Have unmutated and 11q. Doctor would need to get insurance approval which is unknown for Ibrutinib. This would mean br or zanubritib by random if I enter trial.

Hoffy profile image
Hoffy

Bgb3111 is the new technology vs BR the old technology. Bgb3111 is a targeted drug similar to imbruvica as a BTK a inhibitor. Target therapy is where a lot of CLL a therapy is moving to.

CLL society web site has good information as well ,

Hoffy

MrMidnight profile image
MrMidnight

I have been on BGB-3111 for more than two years (after getting very little relief from a chlorambucil-obinutuzumab trial in 2015, no doubt because I have 17p deletion). BGB has worked well for me. My lymph nodes disappeared in a few months and my lymphocyte count has steadily decreased to a whisker above normal in the past three months. The haematologist told me yesterday that none of the 40 patients in this New Zealand arm of the trial have progressed yet (although some will not have been on it as long as me). The most common side effect is spontaneous bruising, he said, although I have had crippling fatigue that is only beginning to lift now. (He also said I was the only one with fatigue.) It seems to be a very good drug that achieves higher concentrations in the blood than Ibrutinib with less toxicity and fewer side effects, but it also doesn't have as long a track record as Ibrutinib yet. The haematologist spoke very highly of it as an option.

Songster profile image
Songster

I too am considering entering this trial. I am 11Q del and unmutated. Been in W & W for 2 and a half years. If not the trial then Ibrutinib. Need to make a choice in the next couple weeks.

Fastone profile image
Fastone

I have been on bgb for nearly two years, firstline treatment with 17 p

delition. Very little side effects, a little bit of bruising, still work hard

physically some days but then only 4-5 hours. Lymphocytes within

normal range in 16 month. I think very highly of it and am thankful

I had the chance to participate in the trial.

All the best.

Fastone

may04cll profile image
may04cll

Why so few locations in the USA , lack of interest or too many hurdles to jump over . Glad it's here though!

kathymac5252 profile image
kathymac5252

Husband had 11 q deletion and only had 4 out of the 6 BR infusions. Though it worked on his upper half lymph nodes, he became severely neutropenic going on 4 months. Doctor said no more chemo for him. He is in his 3 week of Ibrutinib.

Not what you're looking for?

You may also like...

Zanubrutinib / BGB-3111

Hello everybody, I should go for the first line treatment. My choices are Ibrutinib or try to get...

BGB-3111

I have been taking bgb-3111 for 6 weeks. Before the administration of this drug I had white blood...

FCR VS BR

My father's cytogenetics test shows he's trisomy 12. Zap 70 negative CD 38 positive 45% The...

Clinical Trial with BGB-11417

Hi all! Would love to hear from anyone who is participating in / has considered and/or has...

Help, FCR OR BR?

My oncologist has telephoned me today giving me an option of either FCR or BR. As I am 11q del I...