Last night I saw a really distressing local news item about an elderly man, aged 74 and with dementia, being wrestled to the floor in a hospital of all places, because he was found wandering at night and the external security company was called and handled the whole thing really badly. (It happens to be the same company my husband works for, and I can't imagine in my wildest dreams that he or any of his colleagues would have reacted in this uncaring and dangerous way, so I hope this was just one brash and badly trained security officer).
Of course it's difficult always to be sure of facts when you aren't there, but definitely it all sounded absolutely unacceptable.
One solution (after the pivotal one of understanding and training), was suggested as coloured wristbands to identify those who might be wandering around through confusion and vulnerability. An executive of the Alzheimers Society was interviewed and she was at pains to point out that this should only be with the consent of the patient with dementia.
What do you think? I seem to remember that the last time I got admitted overnight to a hospital I was furnished with a coloured wristband to indicate that I was ambulatory and able to attend to my own needs. I don't remember being asked my permission! I think that if it helps staff, the patient, and auxiliary services like security to carry out their work with a better understanding of dementia, I think the bands should just be used, unless it causes an individual particular distress.
Hospitals are busy places and it's all too easy for a confused person to wander off, or even out, and find themselves in danger.
For training purposes in the art of dealing with the confused, I'd employ my sister any day of the week. She is a master at persuasion and calming down my brother-in-law when he becomes confused and agitated. She could have done with only her voice what an unthinking security guard tried to do by force.