Heart muscle damage and ef 45% - British Heart Fou...

British Heart Foundation

54,703 members34,238 posts

Heart muscle damage and ef 45%

Anon2023 profile image
25 Replies

Hello lovely people, I’m hoping for some advice.

I had a mitral valve replacement last year due to regurgitation and then a redo replacement 10 weeks ago due to endocarditis. I had an echo recently and just spoke with a cardiac nurse. She told me that there’s damage to my heart muscle and that my ef was 45%. This was not reassuring and has left me worried sick about what’s coming next

Can anyone tell me if they have heart muscle damage and what an ef of 45% means. Can you live and function even with significant damage and a low ef. ? Can it heal itself? I understand that everyone is individual but it would be great to hear other peoples experiences.

Written by
Anon2023 profile image
Anon2023
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
Read more about...
25 Replies
SheldonC profile image
SheldonC

A normal Ejection Fraction is 50% or greater, a borderline EF is between 41% and 49%, so yours is borderline normal.

A damaged heart muscle can't heal itself, however, it is possible to improve the EF through a combination of exercise and meds.

My EF% is now approx. 47% (it was much lower), I exercise most days, running, cycling and weight training, much as I did before my heart event.

Anon2023 profile image
Anon2023 in reply toSheldonC

Hi. Thank you for your reply. It’s reassuring. I walk every day and don’t particularly get out of breath. I was surprised it was 45% as I’ve felt ok after my surgery 10 weeks ago. I’m 50 and before my heart ops I felt relatively ok so all of this has completely taken me by surprise. I think medical folk forget how frightening this can be and I dread getting a call from the cardiac nurses. They referred me to psychology as the last 6 months have been really traumatic. Let’s hope it helps. Thanks again for your response. I really appreciate it.

SheldonC profile image
SheldonC in reply toAnon2023

I went through similar a couple of years ago, about 18months after my cardiac arrest I had an echo, the person who did it told me it was approx. 35%, I was devastated as I felt I was doing really well!

Managed to see my GP the same afternoon, he really reassured me and as he said the numbers are just that, numbers, how you are feeling is the most important thing.

At 10 weeks post surgery it sounds like you are doing really well, so don't let the 'numbers' hold you back.

The trauma of the events mentally can take longer to heal than our wounds, hopefully the help you get will speed that recovery up, good luck on your journey.

Anon2023 profile image
Anon2023 in reply toSheldonC

Thank you 😊

RufusScamp profile image
RufusScamp

An EF of 45% is not too bad. I was told mine was 20% - nobody pointed out that this was down from around 55% rather than 100%, so I panicked a bit. I was not really aware anything was wrong though. With exercise, meds and a pacemaker, it is now in the normal range, so improvement is possible, how much depends on your condition. You can certainly live and function well, just forget Olympic golds in the more extreme sports.

Anon2023 profile image
Anon2023 in reply toRufusScamp

Hi. Thanks for your reply. Pleased that you are doing well. I think the nurse really scared me because she didn’t explain anything. She just said that she would speak to the cardiologist to see what he thought about it being as “low” as the echo report suggested. No idea when I’ll hear back. I’ve got no clue what my ef was previously as I didn’t even know what it was. It’s so reassuring to hear that it can improve. Thank you again for your reply 😊

RufusScamp profile image
RufusScamp in reply toAnon2023

The nurse probably did not feel qualified to comment in case she did something wrong. I would make a list of things you want to ask when you next speak to your cardiologist. I am still dependent on gadgetry and meds, but I am grateful for what they have done. I hope a similar outcome is possible for you.

Anon2023 profile image
Anon2023 in reply toRufusScamp

Hi. Thank you. I won’t get to see the cardiologist apparently as it’s nurse practitioner led where I am. Unfortunately the nurse prac, while being a very nice person, tends not to be particularly reassuring. I think aftercare is a bit of a lottery 😟

RufusScamp profile image
RufusScamp in reply toAnon2023

Nurse practitioners can be very good. My consultant had a high opinion of mine. I hope you get the help you require.

Anon2023 profile image
Anon2023 in reply toRufusScamp

I think the one I have contact with is just not very reassuring. I’m sure she’s very capable otherwise. I’ve met plenty doctors with rubbish bed side manners too. Maybe because I feel so vulnerable at the moment Im struggling to cope with it and being over sensitive.

RufusScamp profile image
RufusScamp in reply toAnon2023

I feel really lucky because I think in my region there has been a huge drive on how to deal with patients. It can be almost overwhelming. Not what I have experienced in other regions when accompanying relatives!

Davey77 profile image
Davey77 in reply toRufusScamp

Doctors tend to throw statistics around without considering the effect on patients.I had a similar thing with my kidneys where the doctor said their percentage function was a really scary amount and sent me to a consultant who said that was based on a young, fit, person. It was down a much smaller amount from the normal for someone of my age.

Anon2023 profile image
Anon2023 in reply toDavey77

I think the lack of info that I’ve been provided with by the cardiac team just adds to my anxiety. Thanks for your reply and I hope that you are doing well.

Dave678 profile image
Dave678

Hi - after my 2nd HA last March I had an EF of 30-35 and it was same last Sept. As others have said figures of 50-70 are kind of normal ones as lower ones don’t pump as much blood around your body. But, it’s only a figure and I still go walking, biking and a bit of jogging etc without any issues. Drugs like Entresto & Dapagliflozin (which I’m now on) might help get your EF higher as might exercise - or at least hopefully stop it getting worse! I’d discuss your concern with your GP but personally wouldn’t worry unless I was getting out of breath a lot or my ankles were swelling etc. Good luck👍

Anon2023 profile image
Anon2023 in reply toDave678

Hi. Thanks for your reply. I’m pleased that you are doing well. It gives me hope. 😊

Velena profile image
Velena

I had my mitral valve repaired (not replaced) in 2018 and at that time my EF was 62% both before and after the surgery (I never had any symptoms despite the regurgitation having become severe). Had regular check-ups thereafter and all was fine until November 2020 when I was told my heart function had diminished and my EF was 41%. I was prescribed medication but queried why this should be when all reports said my surgery had been very successful. Subsequent MRI and nuclear medicine scans revealed that I had had a "silent" heart attack at some time between my surgery and the latest check-up - I honestly did not notice any symptoms at all and still had no breathlessness or fatigue - which had caused some damage and necrosis which would be permanent. I have just had an angiogram which showed that there is still no problem with my coronary arteries and my EF on this occasion was 49%. I was told to just continue with the medication (ramipril 2.5mg) and this does seem to be helping. The cardiologist had told me to carry on exercising but to avoid very strenuous forms of exercise.

Anon2023 profile image
Anon2023 in reply toVelena

Hi. Thanks for replying. This forum has become a lifeline for me. People are so supportive and informative. I’m also on rampiril but only 1.25 as I’ve got really low blood pressure. I’ve read research somewhere that says that EF reduces after MV surgery which surprised me as I thought it would improve it. Who knows. Anyway I’m pleased you are getting better and thanks again for your reply.

Bigheart58 profile image
Bigheart58

As others have said, an Ejection Fraction of 45 is not too bad. Mine was less than 35 after my heart attack two years ago but is now 47-51.

I can certainly feel the difference as I don’t get nearly so breathless or exhausted. As from the meds, I think the key is continuing to take the right amount of exercise each day. This obviously depends on your age and fitness level. I aim to walk around 7-8k steps including 15 minutes brisk walking.

Good luck!

Anon2023 profile image
Anon2023 in reply toBigheart58

Hi thanks for replying. I appreciate it. I’m walking about 40 mins a day but need to improve on that. I’m waiting for cardiac rehab. I think that exercise and taking the right meds might make a difference but the aftercare here is a bit haphazard. 😦

Kwagmire profile image
Kwagmire

Hi just a quick messege my Ef been 29 for the last few years 5 years actually I think it’s just a number don’t worry live life godbless you kwagmire

Anon2023 profile image
Anon2023 in reply toKwagmire

Hi. Thank you for your reply. I appreciate it.

Ewloe profile image
Ewloe

I had a heart massive attack 8 months ago at 59yrs I was very fit and exercised before that. It left me with permanent muscle damage and at that point my EF was 40%. After medication and a gradual return to exercise ( still not at pre heart attack level) it’s 46%. The main symptoms I have are when I’m walking upstairs or hills, and getting fatigued. But I’m working on specific things to improve this. It’s a very gradual improvement which is frustrating but improvements are a good feeling. Don’t let words bring you down my GP has labelled me with left ventricular failure which sounds depressing but in reality my left ventricle is working better than it was, its not perfect- but who is. And it’s becoming more efficient. Keep doing what your doing. X

Anon2023 profile image
Anon2023

Hi. Thank you so much. You’ve had a hell of a time but it’s good to know that you are getting better. The heart attack must have been terrifying.

I think that medical folk forget the impact that their comments can have sometimes. The nurse scared the hell out of me and then, of course, I did the worst and googled it. I must stop doing that!! It’s been a huge relief to read the messages sent to me, I am so grateful that people take the time to reply.

Qualipop profile image
Qualipop in reply toAnon2023

NEVER google. If you must,then stick to sites like the BHF. The NHS website doesn't tell you much. Best bet is to phone t he BHF nurses.They now operate 9:00 - 5:00 M-F, and 10:00 - 4:00 weekends and bank holidays. Their number is 0300 330 3311.

Anon2023 profile image
Anon2023 in reply toQualipop

I know that you are right. Google is horrendous. Thank you for the telephone number for the bhf nurses and info. 😊

Not what you're looking for?

You may also like...

Ef

Has anyone had severe heart damage with ef 31 but improved their ef without icd and only meds I...
Yasyass profile image

EF Question

Hi, Everyone, Roughly three weeks after my heart attack in March 2022, I had what is called a...

Results from scan. 36% ef. Previous scan in Jan 35-40%. no change since start Dapagliflozin/forxiga. Q. How do we improve ef rate?

39 yrs old. Had a suspect heart attack back in 2019 where my ef rate was 12% and was in ICU for 10...

Heart Failure - 55% EF but still breathlessness

Is it possible to have EF of 55% and breathlessness due to heart failure. I have chest stiffness...
vnarayan profile image

Improving EF

I didn't realise until I joined this forum that EF can be improved upon. I have LV imparement with...
PinkKizzie profile image

Moderation team

See all
HUModerator profile image
HUModeratorAdministrator
Luke_BHF profile image
Luke_BHFPartner
Amy-BHF profile image
Amy-BHFPartner

Content on HealthUnlocked does not replace the relationship between you and doctors or other healthcare professionals nor the advice you receive from them.

Never delay seeking advice or dialling emergency services because of something that you have read on HealthUnlocked.