I am wondering if anyone else has experienced this, last night around 11.30pm I felt my heart misbehave for the first time since my ablation pre-covid. A run of very strong fast beats then fast & erratic. I tried relaxing for a while playing a game on my phone to occupy my mind, but the rate & rhythm continued to be erratic.
Interestingly my Fitbit reading is very different to my Kardia reading. My Kardia is showing “poss AF” with a heart rate jumping between 111 - 156. My Fitbit’s heart chart is fairly normal other than a couple of spikes up to 118. I have tried taking my pulse manually but am having trouble finding the pulse in my wrist! I took a PIP tablet Bisoprolol Fumarate at 1.30am but it doesn’t seem to have made any difference.
Anyone else had this with Fitbit/ Kardia readings?
Thank you in advance for any replies
Kaz
Written by
KazDD
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
The algorithms used by Kardia and Fitbit are imperfect, however the EKG generated by Kardia tells the story. If you cannot read it yourself, have it read by an ep, or have it read by one of Kardia's cardiologists, if that service is available to you. That said, I find Kardia's determinations correct most of the time with afib, unless there are multiple ectopic beats which can throw it off.
Not only do ectopics upset measurements, but they upset pacemakers too.I get 1000 PVCs per hour and these effectively slow the pacemaker down because it counts the PVCs as normal and doesn't bother firing a pulse and instead of a minimum of 70 BPM, I get 40 and feel awful.
I'm on 10 mg Bisoprolol to subdue the ectopics and seeing the consultant in 3 weeks time.
My Fitbit doesn’t always reflect my tachycardia events accurately. It definitely takes longer to show the actual fast heart rate. Where the Kardia shows it quite instantly. If the event lasts long enough, the Fitbit catches up. With the fluctuating heart rates of afib, the Fitbit would have a harder time, even though some models are meant to alert you to afib. Kardia is definitely more accurate.
Sorry I really don't rate Fitbit even after years of using them.I only use a charge 4 and many a time when going on my walk or doing an excercise class it will show something like 145 when I know it is max 90/95.
When I was in hospital earlier this month with a constant 130 HR I kept my Apple Watch on. On a couple of occasions when my obs were being done, my watch was as accurate as the ecg machine but the blood pressure/oxygen level reader wasn’t always the same. The nurse said the ecg was more accurate. So I deduced from this that my Apple Watch is accurate. Is there nothing you can compare to
My Fitbit was all over the shop when I was in Atrial Flutter (we assume!) for 2 months. Some weird peaks (150bpm) that didn't seem to correlate with the pulse in my wrist (not that it was easy to tiw down, it felt erratic). I was told just to ignore it and during cardiac rehab was told not to use it as an indicator of exertion but go off how I was feeling instead. The Kardia has, I believe, more points of contact so is going to give you a more accurate reading and trace. That said, it's amazing what the Fitbit can do from your wrist - it was the first thing to flag possible Afib (which showed up as flutter on the subsequent holter) when I wasn't really feeling symptoms.
My Fitbit does have an AF alert, which thankfully hasn't triggered, but I wouldn't trust it entirely, even measuring steps. Repetitive movements of your arm if you're stood still measure steps and I've even had it chart a HR of over 100 when I wasn't even wearing the bloomin thing.I use it as a guide and it's great to alert me to messages of missed calls when I've got my phone muted when I'm seeing patients.
I could barely find my pulse manually when having an AF episode, which was the big indicator for me.
my reading suggests Fitbit only works when you are at complete rest/no moving
ie asleep. Mine has triggered a few times when I was asleep and gives very detailed report. However when I am awake and have an AF episode (confirmed by Kardia) it does not alert me.
This from US fda:
April 12, 2022
Today, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration is providing an at-a-glance summary of news from around the agency:
* On April 8, the FDA cleared Fitbit’s Irregular Rhythm Notifications software intended to be used with certain wrist-worn consumer products to analyze pulse rate data and identify episodes of irregular heart rhythms that may suggest possible atrial fibrillation. Fitbit’s Irregular Rhythm Notifications software is designed to notify the user when an irregular heart rhythm occurs while the user is not moving. It is intended for over-the-counter use. It is not intended to diagnose or treat atrial fibrillation; for use in people under 22 years of age; or for use in individuals previously diagnosed with atrial fibrillation.
interesting, I have not set up my Fitbit for detecting Afib as I already have a diagnosis but was a bit surprised by the difference in the heart rate reading when in Afib, but I was fast too
I was not satisfied at all with the ecg I was getting from my FitBit Sense, so got a Kardia. MUCH better!!!!! Half the time my Fitbit won't even register my breathing rate at night (no, I'm not dead!), so I question the accuracy of any other data it provides. Another example: Resting HR. Provides a graph for the whole day.........except it will show bursts of resting HR 146+ for an hour at a time. NO WAY that's accurate!
Content on HealthUnlocked does not replace the relationship between you and doctors or other healthcare professionals nor the advice you receive from them.
Never delay seeking advice or dialling emergency services because of something that you have read on HealthUnlocked.
Kardia vs. Boots Blood pressure Monitor.
Kardia
Kardia
Kardia
Kardia 
