Just wondering.....
The evidence here and elsewhere suggests that pace and ablate comprises a good option for many of those folks in later life who have very symptomatic persistent/permanent AF and for whom cardioversion no longer works.
We also know that one or more ablations, whilst on the face of it preventing AF per se, can result in scar tissue that gives rise to re-entrant atrial tachycardias (and I'm not talking about flutter here) that can be more problematic than AF since it does not respond as well to drugs (both anti-arrhythmic or rate control).
Has anyone here ever had pace and ablate where their problem has been mainly/solely atrial tachycardia rather than AF? And, if so, was the PM 1 lead, 2 lead or 3 lead?
In fact, and opening my question up rather more, has anyone here who has had 2 or more ablations ended up with persistent atrial tachycardia? And, if so, how was this dealt with??
Thanks in advance for any and all responses.
Best to all,
Mike