I have a major dilemma. My dilemma is this: do I continue taking the blood thinner (Apixaban) and bring about damage to my kidneys and liver, OR do I stop taking it and take chance having a stroke? But again, there is another huge fear: blood thinners do cause, in some people, hemorrhagic stroke.
So are we trading one type of stroke for another?!
I wander if anyone here has similar predicament.
Here is a short
I have developed paroxysmal atrial fibrillation about 16 months ago. My cardiologist wanted me to take Apixaban (2.5 mg twice a day). I initially refused to take that poison. But then every doctor and every nurse I saw insisted that I go on this medication. They all instilled a fear in me about getting a stroke if I don't take the blood thinner. I finally succumbed to the pressure - so I started taking Apixaban about eight months ago.
I week ago I had my blood drawn — well, analysis of my blood indicate that my Gamma Glutamyl Transferase and Alanine Aminotransferase levels are elevated — probably 150% higher than when I was NOT on Apixaban. My eGFR has dropped by 40% and my platelet level has plummeted…
Sometimes I wander if it is necessary for me to be on the blood thinner at all.
After all I am a healthy woman (if it wasn’t for the Afib).
My total cholesterol level is great. LDL is quit low, HDL is higher than normal and have no other ailments. My weight has always been at the lower end of the spectrum (BMI = 18.5). I am on plant based diet. Actually, I never enjoyed eating any flesh, even as a kid. I don’t eat dairy either… I am very active, except during Afib episode - which tends to last very long now.
I am interested to hear if anyone else here has similar issues?
Written by
Ruza2020
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
In short - YES - anti-coagulants are advised if you have AF, the overwhelming evidence of the efficacy of stroke prevention is now just about indisputable. If you have AF your biggest risk factor is stroke and AF induced strokes are more likely to be much more severe or fatal. Other good health factors will not mitigate your risk!
I don’t know at what stage the concerns for your liver and kidneys would outweigh the concern for your stroke risk? What information and advise were you given?
I have had elevated liver and kidney bloods a few times and all that happened was that I had blood draws more frequently to watch and they soon returned to normal. I don’t know how often you have yours, mine are monthly but at that time they were every week.
I think you need a lot more information and in the meantime I would suggest that you ensure you drink plenty of water.
Should you be unable to continue to take anti coagulants for medical reasons - there are other options such as Watchman Device but I don’t think doing nothing to mitigate the Stroke risk for us AF’ers is an option.
I think we have all had some resistance to taking anti coagulants initially but I have now been on them for 7 years with no ill affects but a few scares with elevated bloods. and What totally convinced me was having a TIA when, after ablation and no AF for over a year, I thought I was safe so I went off them against medical advice. I have been so enthusiastic to return to take any medication than I was to get back onto the A/C’s!
Even if you have had an ablation and you are not experiencing AF and if you are over 65 years - your risk of stroke remains so most of us now accept that we take them for life, period.
I know that isn’t what you want to hear, but it’s your reality now.
There are alternative anticoagulants to apixaban . That said the reason for the regular liver and kidney tests are not because anticoagulants can cause problems there but to check that function is normal as these organs have to excreet the drug. That there is apparently a problem may indicate some other issue which needs investigating rather than blaming the anticoagulant.
That is useful to hear as the OP made me panic a bit? What's the advised time period for testing? I had my bloods done just before lockdown as it happens but sometimes I have to prod our practice here to do their duty.
Like you I was concerned about the side affects of Apixaban so I did not take it when I was diagnosed with SVT and I was OK for about 3 years then I had a major stroke. I did not take them because they can make a bleed worse. Observations while on the stroke ward made me realise that there is not much help they can give if you have a bleed but a stroke they can do quite a lot for and successfully. So much so that I made an almost full recovery in two weeks, that's from having complete right side paralysis. I'm 76.
It's a tough call and each individual is unique. I am a 74 year-old male who has an atrial flutter, but I am asymptomatic and I was diagnosed with such four years ago. Initial anti-coagulant therapy with warfarin was dreadful. It caused a clot to leak in my eye and I was blind for three months until a victrectomy was performed to restore my sight. I also suffered gastrointestinal bleeding. It was terminated. I have minor kidney impairment, but there it is. I am not sclerotic and my CHAD score indicates a possibility of Afib-related stroke at 3% which is not statistically significant. What is your CHAD score?
If your CHAD score is not significant of a-Fib related stroke, why are you considering any anti-coagulant absent a personal history of neurological occurences? I was offered the Anthem device, but one must consume anti-coagulants for a period of at least three to six months before cessation. That's not a solution if the aim is to obviate their usage.
The "book" says a-Fib=anti-coagulant therapy. It is a dogmatic answer. Sportin' Life in Gershiwin's Porgy and Bess has a lyric, "What's writ in the bible ain't necessarily liable. It ain't necessarily so." Good luck. lol
If your score is 2 that's why they want you on anticoagulants. If your BP isn't high (check it over a period of a week) then maybe you can have the conversation with them about this. I'm younger than you - 64 - but my BP can elevate when I'm stressed or tired so I'm prepared to be on the anticoagulants. Remember that the score if 1 for your gender is simply due to statistics - more women get strokes than men.
Hi Ladies, hope you don't mind my butting in but your conversations fit me perfectly although I'm older at 76. Episodes about 10 month apart, no intervention, low BP etc so chads score 3 and all down to age and gender. Frightened to death of anticoags , feel like I'm walking through mud mentally.
Not at all. It's also a judgement call on your part. Remember that many of these medical decisions are stats driven. If your BP is good and you have your episodes so infrequently then discuss this with your GP. Maybe if you undertook to test your BP twice a day?
I have just had my BP monitored for a week as I have a natural low diastolic and low heart rate, it came out on average 58/ 127 and pulse 52 which is normal for me. 1.25 bisoprolol doesn't seem to lower it too much but any higher in dose and I'm bracacardic , other than that I'm asthmatic which isn't a problem ither. I score very low on the hasbled score. My G P' said patients like me are in a very grey area but they just quote the chads score and go on that. I gave in and have been taking the lowest dose Apixiban for 3 weeks but I'm not comfortable at all taking it. I n 15 months I have had 1 episode of 6 hours which stopped itself . As you can imagine I'm very confused. I really do appreciate your reply as I don't know anybody personnely that I can talk to. Many thanks, M
It's mostly Anxiety I guess although I have had a bleed in my eye. I don't have any physical symptoms at all. Both of my parents had A F, My Dad took warfarin and died aged 65 of a bleed on the brain, my mother refused to take anticoagulants because of what happened to him and she's just died aged 98 and only took bisoprolol so here lies the problem. Thanks again.
" score of 2 or higher requires one to take anticoagulants" - that's according to the old guidelines. Your cardiologist may not be aware of the updated guidelines and you can bring it to his attention.
I have been on Apixaban for5 years with no problems.If the Doc. has suggested you would be better off with this harmless drug.Take his advice and not us.I also have AF such a worry.
My kidney results have been fine on it. Also It doesn't matter how heathly a lifestyle you got . It's the fact is. your heart is frequently irregular. That is what causes a stroke.
Am a novice to such things but if I read CHADs 2 aright they have removed gender and raised the age to 75 so you would score zero . ( people will jump in and correct me if I am wrong). I suffer with same dilemma as 65 one episode of AF to date and on aspirin 150mg which I have taken for a long time. It’s a rock and a hard place decision. If AF becomes more frequent I will have to cave and take a blood thinner. It’s horrible when you feel you are being damaged by a medication and let’s face it lots of people are
Content on HealthUnlocked does not replace the relationship between you and doctors or other healthcare professionals nor the advice you receive from them.
Never delay seeking advice or dialling emergency services because of something that you have read on HealthUnlocked.
Apixaban / Eliquis Hair Loss
Eliquis (apixaban) sticker shock in USA - how is it in UK?
Blood thinners and bleeding
Liver function problems resulting from Apixaban medication?
How long to take blood thinner for I frequent paroxysmal AF?
