Continuous home-based EKG monitoring ... - Atrial Fibrillati...

Atrial Fibrillation Support

32,396 members38,731 posts

Continuous home-based EKG monitoring results in a significantly higher rate of AF diagnosis

Sharonica-Admin profile image
14 Replies

The mHealth Screening To Prevent Strokes (mSToPS) randomised clinical trial showed that home-based wearable electrocardiogram (EKG) sensor patch monitoring, compared with delayed monitoring, resulted in a higher rate of atrial fibrillation (AF) diagnosis after four months. Wearing an ECG patch (Zio, iRhythm) for two weeks was equivalent to 12 months of fortnightly monitoring.

For additional heart health information visit our website at heartrhythmalliance.org !

#AFAssociation #AtrialFibrillation #KnowYourRhythm

Read More: cardiacrhythmnews.com/conti...

Written by
Sharonica-Admin profile image
Sharonica-Admin
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
Read more about...
14 Replies
BobD profile image
BobDVolunteer

Why am I not surprised? nothing like wearing a holter monitor to keep your heart in rhythm. When are they available in UK?

Aprilbday profile image
Aprilbday in reply toBobD

Bob-would you explain this to me. I don’t understand what the conclusion of the report is. Are these monitors causing A-AFib to worsen? I am sadly confused.

Gertsen profile image
Gertsen in reply toAprilbday

I think that are just able to catch the AF when it happens. It can be difficult to monitor unless you are wearing something for a while

CDreamer profile image
CDreamer in reply toAprilbday

It’s just a small monitor you wear - it’s about the size of an Elastoplast so quite revolutionary. They’ve been used in the US routinely for a few years but good old U.K. still use the clumsy holter monitors for 24 hours or 7 days which is often not long enough to capture AF episodes if you have PAF.

Aprilbday profile image
Aprilbday in reply toCDreamer

Hi CD! Thank you.

CDreamer profile image
CDreamer in reply toAprilbday

irhythmtech.com/professiona...

BobD profile image
BobDVolunteer in reply toAprilbday

Not at all. They are a small patch which works like a holter monitor . The point of the article is that they can spot far more AF and allow proper diagnosis much quicker than the old fashioned units.

Aprilbday profile image
Aprilbday in reply toBobD

👍🏼

Mike11 profile image
Mike11 in reply toBobD

Same here. I actually felt myself go into AF about five minutes after handing the Holter monitor back. That triggered me to get my own ECG machine.

momist profile image
momist

I'm just being curious here, does anyone know what communication method this device uses? The advertising suggests that it communicates direct with a 'National database'. It's possible it uses the cell phone network direct, but I would have thought that was unlikely from such a small device.

doodle68 profile image
doodle68 in reply tomomist

Here you go momist....

taken from the brochure...

''After you have worn the Zio monitor for the duration prescribed by your doctor, you’ll need to remove it and mail it back to iRhythm in the provided box. Please send your monitor promptly to ensure that your doctor receives your heart rhythm data as quickly as possible.''

irhythmtech.com/patients/ho...

So it looks like you wear the patch for a couple of weeks then send it back to have the recorded data analysed. The patient also logs the symptoms on an app when the device is pressed to record. a noticed episode

It is not unlike a Kardia in some ways...

momist profile image
momist in reply todoodle68

Thanks doodle. I scanned the advertising blurb, but missed that. So yes, not that different and also similar to the Holter monitor, but small, light and neat. You can also wear it in the shower (apparently)!

Jhcoop55 profile image
Jhcoop55

Duh. Of course, one would expect continuous monitoring to more often detect AFIB then a periodic 24 hour monitor. Not exactly a ground breaking study in my opinion, just common sense.

barabas profile image
barabas

I wore this monitor for two weeks in January. It is a vast improvement over Holter monitor. You carry a cell phone type device, which communicates with the monitor that is strapped to your chest for two weeks.

The cell phone type device periodically sends data from the monitor to the company's database. That data is continually monitored by algorithms, and if a reading is considered dangerous, a text message is sent immediately to your EP/MD.

Additionally, your EP/MD receives a report from the Company daily showing all activity.

There is a button on the chest monitor that you are supposed to push if you feel like you are having a Fib or Flutter event. That helps identify events which you notice vs. one's that occur but you do not detect.

In my case, after only a week my EP called me and said - I already have what I need to know, so you can quit wearing it for second week, if you want. We knew that I had Flutter events, but he suspected I may have Afib as well...and if so wanted to address both in one ablation procedure, rather than 2 separate ablations.

The monitor disclosed that, in fact, I did have Afib...but the only "event" I really noticed and "pushed the button" to acknowledge was a Flutter event. There were several Afib events that only the monitor detected.

I continued wearing it a second week, just to see if there was any further meaningful data, but was not.

You can shower with the monitor in place, just need to protect it from a lot of direct water contact. Although have to carry around the cell phone like device, or keep it near you...like on a night stand while sleeping...it is lightweight, has a belt clip, and is really like just carrying a second cell phone.

Wore a Holter monitor for 3 days a few years back...this is a massive improvement. Very impressive technology.

While the Company (Irhythm) requests that you return the monitor to them at completion of test, my EP said that was optional since he already had all the data accessible online from their servers, and in daily reports.

Guessing Company requests return so that they can do quality control checks, e.g. confirm that what was recorded on the device is the same data that was sent to them wirelessly and provided to the EP/MD. Suppose they could be recycling some of the parts to use in new devices...but probably not permitted. They provide a postage free return envelope, so I returned mine to them.

Not what you're looking for?

You may also like...

Apple Watch SE ECG App

Apple Watch ECG apps? I have just bought an Apple Watch for the purpose of monitoring my heart and...
Japaholic profile image

Help needed interpreting an ECG

I obtained the following Kardia ECG showing "Unclassified- AF not detected" with a rate of 130bpm....

Persistent AF and Digoxin

Hi all, My dad had paroxysmal AF but since the beginning of June he has persistent AF. Holter...
priya_uk profile image

AF with a heart rate of 59bpm

Hi all my AF im (paroxysmal af) usually is around 150 then down to 100 when controlled but this...
bushy2016 profile image

Can we develop a useful formula for calculating what is an acceptable heart rate for an individual in AF? (when to seek medical attention)?

Hello, As we have so much experience and knowledge on this site as patients and as medical...
Boombiddy profile image

Moderation team

See all
jess-admin profile image
jess-adminAdministrator
Kelley-Admin profile image
Kelley-AdminAdministrator
Emily-Admin profile image
Emily-AdminAdministrator

Content on HealthUnlocked does not replace the relationship between you and doctors or other healthcare professionals nor the advice you receive from them.

Never delay seeking advice or dialling emergency services because of something that you have read on HealthUnlocked.