I am a 68 year old male, new to the forum, and looking for advice on the above choice.I have had asymptomatic level 1 heart block for about 3 years, usually triggered by aerobic exercise. This results in a HR of 46bpm. I am usually unaware of this unless accompanied by ectopics when I become aware of the difference. Pre flutter I saw 2 rhythms: around 70bpm and the aforementioned 46bpm, some time after exercise. Lately I have developed atrial flutter, again asymptomatic. This has been confirmed by ECG and halter. I now see 3 rhythms: 140bpm, usually with exercise, or even contemplating exercise, with lots of ectopics plus the aforementioned 70/46. Again the 46 only appears after exercise. Pre flutter the slower rhythms usually included ectopics but now these rhythms are very smooth now for some reason. On a recent holiday. no exercise, my HR appeared normal for a week. For this reason my cardiologist thinks I may have been in flutter for some time since I had been avoiding exercise until the turn of the year. The plan is cardioversion in 2 weeks but I am wondering whether to go for ablation on the basis that it may provide a longer term solution. I don't see a downside to cardioversion but my atrium is already moderately enlarged and I understand it may normalise if the flutter can be eliminated. Alternatively even a successful cardio version may be temporary and I may not be aware of a return to
flutter, I now exercise 3 times a weak, including a 4 mile thirty minute run on each occasion. No reaction apart from the 140bpm and later bradycardia. My BP is normal
and am not diabetic.
Sincere apologies for the long post but there appears to be a lot of expertise on this forum.
Jimmy mac