Something I don't seem to have seen anywhere - not spelled out anyway - is how warfarin (in therapeutic range) affects one's risk of stroke. For example I'm 1 and 2 on those two CHAD scores (sorry, I can never remember the full acronyms) which scarily tells me I'm 9 times more likely to suffer a stroke than the average member of the population. A 2.2% annual risk.
So what does warfarin do to that risk? Anyone know? It must reduce it otherwise we wouldn't be taking it, but by how much? Obviously we are talking statistics so we can't expect any guarantees but it would be nice to think that while I'm returning an INR around 2.5, that 9x stat is substantially reduced.....?
Written by
RobertELee
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
I'm no expert, there seems to be a number of statistics bandied around, I haven't seen the nine times, but several articles refer to five times more likely to seven times more likely.
There is an article here which refers to warfarin reducing this from 4.5% to 1.4%, but not quite sure how the maths works on that
Several other articles then refer to warfarin reducing the risk of stroke by between 70% and 50%, and the major dfference seems to be age, as you get older the risk of stroke is higher.
All I know is that at 59 having a stroke terrifies me, not so much the dying from one, but the thought of being do dehabilitated that I would need to be looked after is the really scary thought.
My CHA2DS2-VASc is 0, but I was given the choice to continue on warfarin, and I seized it with both hands, better a few tablets than any thought of a stroke.
Thanks Ian, I entirely agree - the thought of a stroke is sometimes almost more scary than a terminal illness. On the other forum Bob D suggests that, in the best cases, warfarin induced INR in therapeutic range should mean there is no greater risk of stroke than the average person in the population which is very encouraging. I've been in paroxysmal AF since age 60 in 2009 but I think I may now be in transition to permanent as the episodes recently have been lasting longer - currently in a 4-day one. I always 'feel' much more vulnerable to stroke during an AF episode but again it seems that the risk of stroke, whether paroxysmal or permanent, is much the same.
I think I also mentioned recently that AF itself is a risk inducer which once had can not be switched off. Any risk factor remains once given so high blood pressure treated with drugs to normal is still scored. As you say, the risk is constant even when you are not in AF but perhaps more likely if you are
The CHADS score and stroke risk figure is the risk IF you are not on warfarin. My risk figure is 20 since I've already had a TIA (often referred to as mini stroke), and also had high blood pressure in years gone bye. The TIA was scary enough and like Ian, the thought of a full stroke is even more scary. That is one reason that I am perfectly happy taking warfarin and usually try to keep my INR around 2.8. I've been in permanent AF for some years now so that's another good reason to keep "taking the tablets", as they say.
In the early days, 45 years ago and before my cardiologist at the time eventually found out what it was, I would have the occasional days when I just felt very tired. At that time I was just paroxysmal af so it was obviously bouts of af I was having. I had a couple of cardioversions but that didn’t work. After my cardio, at the time, diagnosed the af there was no mention of ablations and he didn’t even start me on warfarin. It wasn’t until I had a TIA that the Haematologist I saw started me on warfarin. I have been persistent/permanent AF now for more years than I can remember and like yourself, no symptoms apart from tiring more easily than I used to. However I just keep telling myself, it’s my age,(77 in April). I’ve had a CRT-D pacemaker for three and a half years although I can’t say I noticed any immediate benefit apart from my HR now being a nice regular 70 bpm at rest, instead of jumping around between 40 and 55 like it used to. It must be doing me some good since I have just spent the last three months renovating our living room in our 220 year old farmhouse. It was a strip it right back to a bare shell job and was quite hard work at times.
Getting back to ablations, the first I heard about it was at a AFA patients day and also found out I should have been seeing an Electro-physiologist. On my next cardiology visit I asked to be referred to an EP. When I eventually saw my EP he said I had been persistent AF too long and the chances of ablation working were very low and the risk was fairly high, so he eventually arranged for the pacemaker. I suppose I have been quite fortunate in also have bundle branch block so my HR never went high as seems to be the “norm”
Hi Leelec, it was before I started on the warfarin, although I had been diagnosed with paroxysmal AF prior to that. The TIA, that was diagnosed was in Nov 2000. I believe I had several more prior to that, that I never went to see my GP about. I now realise I should have, but was much younger and didn't know too much about it then. I am now 70 and have done a lot of studying regarding AF and TIA's since 2000. Also notice Bernard's post after mine. The 2 types of stroke are Cerebral Thrombosis, caused by a blood clot, the main risk with AF, and Cerebral Heamorage caused by a ruptured blood vessel in the brain. If the INR is not high enough then the risk of thrombosis increases and if its too high then the risk of a bleed increases. Hence the importance of keeping your INR within your therapeutic range, normally 2 to 3 for AF. I've twice had mine at 11 and involved a stay in hospital on Vitamin K injections to get it back down. After the second "high episode", when I was working away from home, I decided to get my Coaguchek Monitor so I could keep a weekly check on my INR. Sorry to go on a bit but hope it all helps.
Hi leelec. I know this is not very helpful but as far as I am aware there are two types of stroke - those caused by a clot and those caused by a bleed so you pays your money and takes your chioce. I have A/F and am on warfarin but I personally believe that there is less of a chance for me to have a bleed stroke whilst on warfarin than a clot stroke if I am not. Makes you wonder if it is worth asking sometimes.
My CHAD score is 1 (Blood Pressure) but have age on my side (59) I'm now in permanent AF, but asymptomatic. I was diagnosed with paroxysmal AF back in 2009. I was prescribed Warfarin back then, and remained on it for about eight months, but could never be stablised with INR only reaching the recommended level on all but a few occasions. I then moved onto Aspirin, which I took for a number of years. However, as we know, the value of Aspirin is now not particularly good as a blood thinner, so I always felt that I was at risk from a stroke. I discussed this with my GP, and in the first instance, was only offered to be moved from Aspirin to Warfarin. However, I would have liked to be moved onto one of the new novel Blood-thinners, and although turned down the first time, again mentioned my instability with Warfarin, and then was prescribed Dibigatran, which I started last week.
However, like all of us on here, we want to reduce the risk of a stroke the best we can. I will have to see if I can find out the risk percentages that you mention above.
Content on HealthUnlocked does not replace the relationship between you and doctors or other healthcare professionals nor the advice you receive from them.
Never delay seeking advice or dialling emergency services because of something that you have read on HealthUnlocked.
starting warfarin
Going on Warfarin
side effects of warfarin
Anticoagulants- the risk of stroke v risk of bleeding caused by falls.
Comparing Effectiveness of Anticoagulants
