Help us prepare for post RP 1st PSA A... - Advanced Prostate...

Advanced Prostate Cancer

22,874 members28,485 posts

Help us prepare for post RP 1st PSA Appointment

Egvb profile image
Egvb
24 Replies

Hi everyone,

My 69 year old father is preparing for his forst PSA January 8th after RP early October.

His stats are in my BIO.

Given the positive margins, EPE and possible Cribriform pattern, I would like to come into this appointment with as much information and as empowered as possible to be his best advocate.

Question for all, could we be doing anything prior to his appointment with the surgeon that will give us more information to make the best decisions? Perhaps Decipher testing or a second opinion pathology done at John Hopkins or another center?

Also if anyone is being treated in Miami and would recommend a RO or MO I would love to receive those recommendations. He is currently being treated at University of Miami.

*** Also, 2.5 weeks post RP his primary doctor ordered a PSA by mistake aling woth other tests that he had to have done, and it was at 0.2, but I guess 2.5 weeks was too soon anyways.

Thank you.

Written by
Egvb profile image
Egvb
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
Read more about...
24 Replies
Justfor_ profile image
Justfor_

His "by mistake" PSA looks good. 2.5 weeks at a 3.5 days max PSA half life, decays his pre surgery PSA of 7.3 to 1/32 or 0.23. By your next test it will be at the limit of detectability. One piece of advice though. Insist on PSA reporting to, at least, two decimal places (three decimal places even better).

Egvb profile image
Egvb in reply toJustfor_

Thank you for your reply and recommendations. What is normally considered undetectable at the 3 month mark? 0.1-0.2 would be BCR?

Justfor_ profile image
Justfor_ in reply toEgvb

Anything preceded by the less than "<" sign. BUT, <0.1 is grossly deceiving. Aim for <0.01 or <0.02 depending on the lab's analytical precision. Best of all <0.01x for a lab reporting to the thousands.

Egvb profile image
Egvb in reply toJustfor_

Thank you very much.

street-air profile image
street-air in reply toEgvb

it is more about the change over time. If for example he gets a 0.05 the surgeon is likely to say dont worry, we will test again and see if it is going up down or sideways. If it doesnt change from test to test then they will he satisfied. Cancer grows without treatment, after all.

ManuteBol1 profile image
ManuteBol1 in reply toEgvb

If you get an ultrasensitive PSA test from Quest, the threshold is <0.02. I’d recommend a uPSA from Labcorp (if you are in the U.S.), as their threshold is <0.006. Believe it or not, there is plenty of recurrence probability information in those low thresholds in many cases. Don’t be deceived by docs or others that say there isn’t.

ManuteBol1 profile image
ManuteBol1 in reply toEgvb

If you had 0.1-0.2 at the 3 month mark, that wouldn’t be classified as BCR. It would be persistent PSA. There are plenty of studies that show how the shorter term (most are done over the first 3 years) recurrence odds shift if your 3 or 6 month PSA is in various buckets below 0.03. The probability differences for recurrence in those buckets are stark. However, the trend in the PSA is also important. For example, if you start at 0.015 after three months and it sits there for two years, maybe it is just benign tissue left behind. But if you start at 0.015 and then go to 0.018 in 6 months then 0.020 three months after that, cancer probably remains. I’d like to see more longer term studies (like 7+ years) done on recurrence odds given various uPSA levels 3 months after surgery, but those are harder to find. In my case, I’m <0.006 after a year, but I was a 4+3 and had some cribiform component and possible small positive margins, so I’m always leery that the disease is still lurking.

Egvb profile image
Egvb in reply toManuteBol1

Thank you for such valuable information! My father is 3+4 but also has a Cribiform component I believe (Pathology says presents cribiform morphology, but then says no cribiform glands present - surgeon didn’t mention anything so I’ve put it on my list of questions for next appointment. Also a 1mm margin present.

ManuteBol1 profile image
ManuteBol1 in reply toEgvb

I noticed that it seemed conflicting about the cribiform in what you had typed. Cribiform just increases the odds of recurrence, as you probably know. Not a slam dunk for anything. Just an adverse finding. I’m sure there are plenty of cribiform dudes walking around 20 years later with no recurrence.

ManuteBol1 profile image
ManuteBol1 in reply toEgvb

AI says……learn something new everyday

"Cribriform morphology" refers to the overall architectural pattern of a tumor under a microscope, characterized by a "sieve-like" appearance with multiple small holes or spaces within a continuous sheet of cells, while "cribriform glands" specifically describes individual glandular structures within a tumor that exhibit this cribriform morphology, meaning they have multiple small lumens within their cellular mass; essentially, cribriform morphology describes the overall pattern, while cribriform glands are individual components of that pattern, often used in the context of prostate cancer diagnosis

T911 profile image
T911

I was treated in Miami. Very happy with Miami Cancer Institute at Baptist Health. Started my journey at Moffitt Cancer Center in Tampa and after going to visit RO Dr Weiss in Miami for a second opinion immediately switched my care to him and his team. Couldn't be happier with the care I received there and the facility itself. Know other people being treated there for other cancers as well and all say the same.

Egvb profile image
Egvb in reply toT911

Thank you. I know people with other cancers that have been treated at MCI too, and have been very happy with their care. I will look into Dr.Weiss as I want to make sure if radiation is the next step we have gotten second opinions and are truly happy with our choice of RO.

dmt1121 profile image
dmt1121

I didn't see his Gleason score. That is helpful to know because it drives some of your decision making.

Egvb profile image
Egvb in reply todmt1121

3+4=7

dmt1121 profile image
dmt1121

This is typically between low and high grade disease. I can depend when it is diagnosed and how it is treated. If aggressively treated, it can be curable, but I am not sure this is true in his case, based on his history.

NanoMRI profile image
NanoMRI

To prepare, IMO you need to choose a PSA value you will rely on as best indicator, and for years going forward. I and some others, certainly not all, rely on <0.010. My value after my RP was 0.051 and we accepted cancer remained, had spread. I share this fully recognizing there are varying opinions and disparities on the use of ultrasenstive testing and the definition of BCR. My third treatment, salvage lymph node surgery, confirmed six cancerous pelvic lymph nodes at uPSA 0.13 . IMO relying on values of <0.2 and <0.1 and the term term undetectable are dangerously misleading. If the test result suggests cancer remains several more confirmation tests are warranted. I would use 30 day intervals.

Regarding your dads test at 2.5 weeks - this is not too soon - you get a value to consider. Based on half-life calculations the pre RP PSA of 7.3 would reduce to around .2 in this timeframe. As we know one test is not enough. If you are anxious (I would be) you can order your own ultrasensitive PSA test via a service such as RequestATest or WalkInLab. They use LabCorp with values reporting to thousands. You could get your dad tested Monday and have result Tuesday. Based on half-life calculations you do not need to wait any longer for nadir; certainly not until January. I hope this helps. All the best for your family!

Egvb profile image
Egvb in reply toNanoMRI

Thank you so much for all this valuable information and well wishes!

j-o-h-n profile image
j-o-h-n

Greetings Egvb,

Bring a pad and a pen and document conversations or bring along a tape recorder (ask questions). Search our HU history file that contains past posts that probably mention doctors in Miami. You're a wonderful daughter acting as his caregiver. As you know most men are not fond of dealing with doctors, hospital or anything remotely medical. Give your dear Dad our regards and keep posting here and if possible keep updating his bio.

Good Luck, Good Health and Good Humor.

j-o-h-n

ManuteBol1 profile image
ManuteBol1 in reply toj-o-h-n

If she brings a tape recorder, half the visit will be explaining what it is to the doctor if he’s under 45.

j-o-h-n profile image
j-o-h-n in reply toManuteBol1

How freaking true you are.

Answer: a new type of cell phone....

(Note: Since I talk so much I tell people that my mother once told me that as a baby I was vaccinated with a phonograph needle. No laughter, smile or reaction since most people don't know what a phonograph is (was)) p.s. I'm 88.

Good Luck, Good Health and Good Humor.

j-o-h-n

Tall_Allen profile image
Tall_Allen

There's nothing to know before he gets his first PSA. Take it from there.

Egvb profile image
Egvb in reply toTall_Allen

Happy New Year to everyone!

My Dad just had his first “official” PSA post RP, result was <0.04 , just uploaded in his portal. We will meet (and I mean WE is he lets me attend) in 2 days.

Given his T3a, Cribriform morphology and 1mm positive margin (more info in BIO) anything comes to mind that we should be addressing in this meeting?

Justfor_ profile image
Justfor_ in reply toEgvb

<0.04 doesn't provide much information at this stage. A lab drilling down to <0.01 or better <0.006 or <0.003 would have been more appropriate.

Tall_Allen profile image
Tall_Allen in reply toEgvb

Great news!

Not what you're looking for?

You may also like...

Post RP PSA rising?

I was diagnosed 11/18 with Gleason 9 PC. Started 6 month ADT trial at MDA 12/18. Had RP at MDA...
tfly59 profile image

PSA increasing with negative PET scan post RP

I am posting on behalf of my father who is 64 yo. He was diagnosed with PC at age 54 and had a RP....
Barrett1313 profile image

Seeking Post-RP Advice for Very High Risk, G9, Low PSA

I had RP in Aug 2019 at 56 years of age. Pre-surgery PSA was 5.3. Pathology showed G9, negative...
DJBUNK profile image

After RP had a PSA of 1.7. Went for a ga-PSMA scan wondering what’s next?

My husband is 56 years old. His PC is a gleason 9, he had RP on 3/16/20, SVI, 9/43 positive lymph...
dkingsley profile image

PSA after RP.

Hi all, I had my first blood test today, 10 weeks since RP. It was the standard PSA test and not...
MrDexter profile image

Moderation team

Bethishere profile image
BethishereAdministrator
Number6 profile image
Number6Administrator
Darryl profile image
DarrylPartner

Content on HealthUnlocked does not replace the relationship between you and doctors or other healthcare professionals nor the advice you receive from them.

Never delay seeking advice or dialling emergency services because of something that you have read on HealthUnlocked.