A PSMA scan is not equivalent to a bone scan/CT, it detects mets the bone scan will not detect. Therefore if the PSMA scan detects more than three mets, it does not mean that radiation of the prostate will not be beneficial. The number of three is not a sharp cliff. Radiating the prostate when there are three bone mets is more beneficial than if there are four. But radiating when there are four bone mets helps too. Here is an image to illustrate why a PSMA scan is not equivalent to a bone scan/CT:
my husband has high volume Mets to spine. We were told by local RO radiation not an option due to that. We are meeting with MO at MSKCC this week and will see what they say.
Here is an image how beneficial prostate radiation is depending on the number of bone mets detected with a bone scan. It seems to be beneficial up to 8 mets. Therefore STAMPEDE plans to use up to five bone mets in future trials.
thanks. So you are saying PSMA shows more mets than a bone scan shows and that radiation to prostate can be useful also when PSMA shows more than 5 mets ?
My husband completed 28 IMRT radiation treatments in March. He was diagnosed in November with 3 small mets on ribs and scapular. The other mets are in lymph nodes and seminal vesicles. The RO said he’s kind of in the middle between low and high volume mets. And his MO feels it’s low enough that he doesn’t recommend chemo at this time. I’m not quite sure what the radiation focused on other than the prostate and immediate area around it, the RO said the mets on the bones were so small on the scan he wasn’t even sure they could pinpoint those with something like SBRT. And he has no pain.
Content on HealthUnlocked does not replace the relationship between you and doctors or other healthcare professionals nor the advice you receive from them.
Never delay seeking advice or dialling emergency services because of something that you have read on HealthUnlocked.