PSMA Scans and False Positives - Advanced Prostate...

Advanced Prostate Cancer

22,349 members28,110 posts

PSMA Scans and False Positives

Jeffdanger profile image
6 Replies

So I saw my MO yesterday to review my ongoing treatment of Xtandi and Lupron. Been 3 months so far with no real side effects except hot flashes. My PSMA scan showed prostate and one met to sacrum. Prostate treated with 28 rounds of EBRT. MO says since sacrum is so close to prostrate it might have been a scattering or reflection and no met at all meaning the cancer was contained in the prostate with no mets. Anyone have any idea of the amount of false positives in this test any any way to verify?

Written by
Jeffdanger profile image
Jeffdanger
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
Read more about...
6 Replies
Tall_Allen profile image
Tall_Allen

What was the SUVmax?

Jeffdanger profile image
Jeffdanger in reply toTall_Allen

Here are the findings:

Study Result

Narrative & Impression

EXAM: PET/CT PSMA PROSTATE IMAGING STUDY

STUDY COMPLETED DATE/TIME: 1/25/2023 4:21 PM.

CLINICAL INDICATION: Malignant neoplasm of prostate

PRIOR STUDIES: No prior PMSA studies have been performed.

CORRELATIVE STUDIES: There are no pertinent prior imaging studies available for comparison.

TECHNIQUE: A low-dose CT scan was performed for attenuation correction and anatomic correlation only. Subsequently, the patient received an IV injection of 9.3 mCi of F18-DCFPyL (PYLARIFY), a prostate-specific membrane antigen. After an initial uptake phase of 60 minutes, positron emission tomography images were obtained from the mid thigh to the vertex of the skull. CT, PET and fused images were reconstructed in transaxial, coronal, and sagittal projections and interpreted from a workstation.

FINDINGS:

*REFERENCE VALUES:

-Descending aorta (blood pool) mean SUV: 1.9 SUV.

-Liver mean SUV: 5.4 SUV.

-Parotid mean SUV: 14.8 SUV.

F18 DCFPyL PET:

Physiologic distribution:

-Normal physiologic distribution of tracer is seen in the salivary and lacrimal glands, blood pool, liver, spleen, pancreas, peripheral ganglia, bone marrow, bowel, kidneys and urinary tract.

Prostate:

-There are 2 subcentimeter foci of the hypermetabolic activity at the prostate gland at the posterior peripheral aspect. The focal metabolic activity around right site demonstrated SUV of 35.1 and left side demonstrated SUV of 10.4.

Lymph nodes nodes:

-There is no discrete focal PyL uptake in lymph nodes to suggest metastatic disease.

Skeleton:

-Focal sclerosis of 1.2 cm with increased radiotracer activity at the sacrum demonstrated SUV of 15.5. Additional CT findings:

-Lung parenchymal evaluation, including for punctate nodules, is limited by low-dose CT and non breathhold technique.

Cholecystectomy.

IMPRESSION:

There are 2 foci of hypermetabolic activity at the prostate gland posteriorly, likely correlate with patient's known neoplastic process.

Metastasis (1.2 cm) identified at the body of the sacrum.

Tall_Allen profile image
Tall_Allen in reply toJeffdanger

With uptake that high and with a sclerotic CT correlate, it is not likely a false positive.

Jeffdanger profile image
Jeffdanger in reply toTall_Allen

Thanks for looking and commenting. Interesting thing is I had a lumbar mri and a full body ct scan within a month of this test and neither showed any sclerotic areas on the sacrum.

LongTimeRunning profile image
LongTimeRunning in reply toJeffdanger

Bone and CT scans showed a 2.1 cm lesion on my L2 vertebrae in Jan 2023. My PSMA scan in the following April didn't show anything on L2 (only in pelvis). Bone/CT scans latter in the summer show the L2 lesion sclerosis nearly completely resolving (and the trend continued). The L2 was the biggest lesion from my first scans but the only one that didn't show PSMA activity. A false positive? No clue. It presented via scan progression as if it wasn't, unless it was somehow related to the the heavy (for me) barbell squatting I was doing.

NanoMRI profile image
NanoMRI

Consider 2nd radiology opinion - I have found them to be critical to my decision making.

Not what you're looking for?

You may also like...

False Hope?

today I went to MDAnderson to get my results from my MRI w/wo contrast. Endorectal. Ouch. Hate...

Conflicting MRI vs PSMA scans

Well it appears that the radiologist who did my MRI was overly cautious. The report said I had a...

First PSMA PET scan and aftermath

My oncologists (medical and radiation) had been pushing me to have a PSMA scan for two years. Even...
dhccpa profile image

SBRT impact on bone marrow

Hi Everyone, Have any of you experienced a decrease in bone marrow function of RBCs or WBCs that...
Shanti1 profile image

PSMA results

So great news, there are no distant mets, but the L side of Prostate lit up along with the...
dockam profile image

Moderation team

Bethishere profile image
BethishereAdministrator
Number6 profile image
Number6Administrator
Darryl profile image
DarrylPartner

Content on HealthUnlocked does not replace the relationship between you and doctors or other healthcare professionals nor the advice you receive from them.

Never delay seeking advice or dialling emergency services because of something that you have read on HealthUnlocked.