historical question about pc life exp... - Advanced Prostate...

Advanced Prostate Cancer

21,035 members26,216 posts

historical question about pc life expectancy circa 2011

compiler profile image
22 Replies

My memory is vague on this. I was dx. 12/2009 (G4+3). Failed surgery and by about 3/2011 failed SRT. I recall reading at that time that the average life expectancy was 6 years. I was about 65 years old. That was upsetting, but it gave me a goal and helped my determination. Nowadays we would never say that. We have many bullets these days. My question: was that even true at that time? I can't find any such statistics. Imight be "misremembering."

Written by
compiler profile image
compiler
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
Read more about...
22 Replies
Schwah profile image
Schwah

If you Google “metastatic prostate cancer life expectancy”, you will still see posts that indicate that about 2/3 will be dead in 5 years of diagnosis. However that’s stat is no longer applicable and is looking in the rearview mirror. The numerous new drugs and treatments have extended life expectancy greatly since that was written.

Schwah

Kevinski65 profile image
Kevinski65

Yeah , they gave me 6 years. I'm at 10.

LearnAll profile image
LearnAll

With every new treatment ,they tout that it increases survival BUT they keep repeating the 30% 5 year survival number . One of the statement has to be wrong. If 5 year survival is still at 30% then, it means all the new treatments which came in last 15 years are totally useless. It can not be so. My guess is that repeating 15 years old number of 30% survival serves the purpose of keeping the fear factor very high to accomplish sale of new and expensive treatments. More fear.. more sales.

pjoshea13 profile image
pjoshea13

For men with mets at diagnosis, it was true that only 30% survived 5 years. Some would have it that things are much better these days, but I doubt that many survive 10 years. Which is why some of us are open to science-based complementary approaches.

I'm being blunt about this because the SOC purists sometimes oversell new therapies IMO.

-Patrick

Schwah profile image
Schwah in reply to pjoshea13

Is it pretty much a known that men with mets at diagnosis generally have a shorter life expectancy than those with BCR? If so what’s the reasoning do you think?

Schwah

pjoshea13 profile image
pjoshea13 in reply to Schwah

I remember that, many years back, my urologist tried to reassure me. I was unaware of the lesion at L5 at the time. He said: " I can keep you alive. ... Unless you get mets. Those guys don't do well."

Well, of course, the guys with mets would be with an oncologist before they died.

I suddenly understood the (US) stats. "The rate of new cases of prostate cancer was 112.7 per 100,000 men per year. The death rate was 18.9 per 100,000 men per year. These rates are age-adjusted and based on 2015–2019 cases and deaths." [SEER]

<17% progress to metastasis. That's why my doc was able to say that most of his patients were with him a long time (& died of something else.)

Two distinct populations. "Died with it - not of it." applies to that other population.

And until there is SOC that leads to a meaningful durable remission for the majority, I shall pursue complementary measures.

-Patrick

dhccpa profile image
dhccpa in reply to pjoshea13

Gamechanging, practice changing new treatments are on the way! We're moving to a new frontier...

pjoshea13 profile image
pjoshea13 in reply to dhccpa

After 18 years I lack your optimism. But I hope you are right. -Patrick

dhccpa profile image
dhccpa in reply to pjoshea13

Cynics would say I was being sarcastic. Those cynics never let up...

mrscruffy profile image
mrscruffy

The thing I wonder is were all the people in the study diagnosed at the same timeline? Mine was caught early, I have a neighbor diagnosed at the same time but disease had spread to organs, his life expectancy is far less than mine. Seems that would skew the numbers

compiler profile image
compiler

I am talking about life expectancy in 2011 after failing the two curative bullets. I still recall it was 6 years, but my research comes up empty. There are articles comparing txs after dx, but nothing that matches my criteria. Then again, I am not a sophisticated researcher. I am almost 13 years post-dx. It has not been easy. Assorted HT uses (great responses to Lupron+Casodex) and then vacations. Assorted scans (C11, best at that time, then Ga-68 PSMA) followed by SBRT to beat back 2 ext. hot nodes each time. Later this month it's another scan (Pylorify PSMA). Hoping for the best.

Mel

maley2711 profile image
maley2711 in reply to compiler

Have you asked any MOs??????

dhccpa profile image
dhccpa in reply to compiler

Six years is probably just what your doc pulled out of the air.

Farn profile image
Farn

Does anyone know the breakdown of the subgroups ie Lymph nodes alone best outcome

Bones not so good

Lymph and bones worse still

Lymph bones and visceral worst of all

Then add in high or low volume

Is this the way to assess your survival prognosis ?

LearnAll profile image
LearnAll in reply to Farn

Yes. Lymph nodes mildest, Bones moderate, Bones+ lymph nodes moderately severe and Visceral severe..About high volume or low volume...not sure. However, extent of disappearance of mets with ADT is a prognostic marker. So is physical performance level and a bunch of other biomarkers like ALP, Albumin, Hemoglobin, Ferritin, LDH, CRP etc.

Extremely low Nadir PSA achieved is a very important prognostic marker.

old64horn profile image
old64horn

Compiler, I know your history from Healingwell forum. You were diagnosed few months after me. I Gleason 8, I was given the 5 year number at the time of DX and I’m now at over 13 and still around

dhccpa profile image
dhccpa in reply to old64horn

Your individual results are just one teeny weeny piece of the results in total. I suspect the overall average is closer to 5 than to 13, even today.

Dont08759 profile image
Dont08759

As a 32 year metastatic rectal cancer survivor I can tell you for the individual these numbers are meaningless. Life is finite, everyday is a gift! Although none of us will be cured, hopefully your treatment will extend your QOL. Put your energy is research and this site and its contributors are a great start!

Mischa1111111 profile image
Mischa1111111

i thinkl that it is unecesarly sadistic and uneccesary for any patient to be told that. Especially dubious ,outdated statistics. Uneccesary fear factors serve no purpose in treatment, recovery , or remission. More forward thinking like the kind you find here is what's really needed.

SteveTheJ profile image
SteveTheJ

I was told, two years ago, 3 to 5 years with stage 4.

leo2634 profile image
leo2634

Good morning Brothers, I have extensive bone Mets at diagnosis along with a not so impressive Gleason record of 8s and 9s across the board. I as all of us said well this is it give me my expiration date. I asked my Doctor how long and he said nobody really knows that answer but I promise to do my best to keep you alive and up to date on treatment options that was five years ago. Listen Brothers we all have an expiration date with or without APC so live your life to the fullest. If you want that new car buy it, if you want that dream vacation go. Never give up Never surrender. Leo

Bspouse profile image
Bspouse in reply to leo2634

Well said. thank you.

You may also like...

Question from thread about life expectancy and bone mets

I just read the post about life expectancy and bone mets. So my question to those men with long term

Life expectancy shock revelation

guidance he would need an indication of life expectancy to determine the best option for me to...

PC treatment question

Urologist prescribed Eligard every 6 months for 2 years followed by 6 month vacation and then...

Life expectancy after docetaxel

longevity? Statistics only please, no opinions. (I am not a chemo candidate at this time but...

A warning about PC and supplements containing Cordyceps S.

to support his immune system. He had a pet scan about 9 days after starting the supplement which...