Psa from labcorp did ultra sensitive ... - Advanced Prostate...

Advanced Prostate Cancer

22,373 members28,135 posts

Psa from labcorp did ultra sensitive assay change again?

Mikes21 profile image
29 Replies

Hi All,

Five months ago I posted that I went from an ultra sensitive psa of <.006 to <.014 and people experienced the same with their psa test from labcorp changing their assay. Just got my latest psa of <.031 so I am concerned with the doubling from <.014 to <.031. So I am wondering if labcorp changed the assay again or does it even matter since it’s still undetectable? Thanks in advance for your response.

Mike

Written by
Mikes21 profile image
Mikes21
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
Read more about...
29 Replies
LearnAll profile image
LearnAll

Mike..stop doing ultrasensitive PSA...its waste of moneyt and causes unnecessary anxiety.

Should do plain total PSA. only.

There are two types of assays...First one is Beckman Coulter and second one is Siemens...

The reading is 20% lower with Siemens . Quest uses Siemens. It is more accurate.

Mikes21 profile image
Mikes21 in reply toLearnAll

My Dr keeps doing them. So if I do regular then it should just be .1 right?

LearnAll profile image
LearnAll in reply toMikes21

Seems like your Doc likes to keep you like a frog on hot plate. Your prostate is absent so anything below 0.2 is considered fine.

Mikes21 profile image
Mikes21 in reply toLearnAll

Thanks LearnAll. I kind of feel like that frog lol

leach234 profile image
leach234 in reply toLearnAll

Not true Quest in California uses Beckman Coulter and it is less than Siemens

leach234 profile image
leach234 in reply toLearnAll

I for one would want to know if my PSA was trending upward from .01 to .03 to .05 to .08 before hitting 0.1.

in reply toleach234

Same here. There is NIH research that concludes that some therapies are more effective if the PSA threshold is lower than what a standard test can measure. My SOC MO wants me to do uPSA. I don't argue on that one.

Shooter1 profile image
Shooter1

Mine has gone from 0.008 to 0.13 and back with its bounces. Some even 0.00 in the last year. Don't sweat the small stuff. Last was 0.08

Mikes21 profile image
Mikes21 in reply toShooter1

Was that without the < sign?

Shooter1 profile image
Shooter1 in reply toMikes21

yes---no < sign

Mikes21 profile image
Mikes21 in reply toShooter1

Ok thx. We are in it together buddy

Tall_Allen profile image
Tall_Allen

As long as the "<" sign appears, it means undetectable on that test. There is no doubling, just a different test kit was used.

You are considered undetectable. Rejoice. As long as you are <0.1 [that is less than 0.1] you are in tall cotton.

Gourd Dancer

Don_1213 profile image
Don_1213

Just use Quest for the test. They don't do ultrasensitive. My uro always writes the script for ultra, and he gets regular from Quest (and I can sleep at night.)

leach234 profile image
leach234 in reply toDon_1213

Quest Diagnostics where I live ALWAYS does ultra sensitive test using Beckman Coulter machine.

Mikes21 profile image
Mikes21 in reply toleach234

Does you number bounce around?

leach234 profile image
leach234 in reply toMikes21

No. For 2.5 years it has consistently been <0.02, the lowest level my Quest Diagnostics lab can detect. I was a Ductal Adenocarcinoma Gleason 8 with a pre surgery PSA of 5.2. Post surgery pT2 with a 2mm focal positive margin.

leach234 profile image
leach234

My GP used a lab that uses Siemens machine when I got my annual physical and my PSA was 0.03. I then used my Urologists normal lab (Quest) that uses Beckman Coulter machine and my PSA was <0.02. Conclusion: Beckman Coulter machines will give you a lower value.

Don_1213 profile image
Don_1213

@Leach234,

Interesting - here is verbatim the wording from my Quest report:

==========================================

PSA, TOTAL

<0.1 Reference Range: < OR = 4.0 ng/mL

The total PSA value from this assay system is

standardized against the WHO standard. The test

result will be approximately 20% lower when compared

to the equimolar-standardized total PSA (Beckman

Coulter). Comparison of serial PSA results should be

interpreted with this fact in mind.

This test was performed using the Siemens

chemiluminescent method. Values obtained from

different assay methods cannot be used

interchangeably. PSA levels, regardless of

value, should not be interpreted as absolute

evidence of the presence or absence of disease

Performing Sites

QTE Quest Diagnostics-Teterboro, One Malcolm Ave, Teterboro, NJ 07608-1011 Laboratory Director: Lawrence Tsao MD

==========================================

So - ??? I've had probably 12-15 tests done by them - and it's always the same reference to the Siemens machine.

FWIW - I've discussed the significance of this with my med-onc (Dr. Charles Drake) and he agreed with me that the high-sensitivity readings are really unnecessary and can be misleading, especially if you had any treatment other than RP. Ones that are focal can end up leaving a small amount of un-cancerous prostate tissues that will make the ultra-sensitive readouts bounce around.

If I had a choice - I'd still go for the one I'm getting - the non-ultra-sensitive read since I don't need to be kept awake nights for differences that really aren't significant.

YMMV it seems, depending on the Quest lab your samples are sent to.

Mikes21 profile image
Mikes21 in reply toDon_1213

I had rp so my oncologist likes to run the ultra sensitive one. Thanks

EdBar profile image
EdBar

Interesting, I’m due for labs next week, I always get the ultra sensitive test and prefer to. It doesn’t cause anxiety and I want an early heads up if it becomes detectable again so I can plot a course of action. As several others have said, as long as it’s still < you’re good to go.

Ed

Mikes21 profile image
Mikes21 in reply toEdBar

Do you use labcorp? If so please let me know how it goes and if you care to share the number that would be awesome. Thanks!

TJGuy profile image
TJGuy in reply toMikes21

Labcorp ultra sensitive PSA test.

Test 140731CPT 84153

This reports down to <0.014

as of January 2021

TJGuy profile image
TJGuy in reply toTJGuy

Test 140731

CPT 84153

Mikes21 profile image
Mikes21 in reply toEdBar

Turns out I don’t have the < and it is now .031 so I have a call into dr.

EdBar profile image
EdBar in reply toMikes21

Bummer, it’s worth a retest and maybe a little tinkering with your meds will knock it back down.

EdBar profile image
EdBar

Yes I use Labcorp and I’ll let you know.

Ed

Mikes21 profile image
Mikes21 in reply toEdBar

Thanks Ed!

j-o-h-n profile image
j-o-h-n

I go by taste.............

Good Luck, Good Health and Good Humor.

j-o-h-n Thursday 10/22/2020 6:08 PM DST

Not what you're looking for?

You may also like...

Labcorp ultra sensitive psa assay change again?

Hi friends. Just had an ultra sensitive psa done and I went from <.014 to <.006. I thought they...
Mikes21 profile image

What happens on psa ultra sensitive going from <.014 to now .031 without the < sign

Should I be panicking over a new reading of .031 up from <.014? When the pa for my oncologist...
Mikes21 profile image

Ultra sensitive PSA?

Since Prostatectomy My PSA results always come back as .1, .2, .3 etc..and the numbers are never...
ixolib profile image

Psa ultra sensitive test results

So I had my prostate removed in April 2016 and had hormone treatment until August of 2018. My...
Mikes21 profile image

Ultra sensitive psa

As my MO basically doesn't want to engage in conversation during my 5 min appointments as he feels...
APK3 profile image

Moderation team

Bethishere profile image
BethishereAdministrator
Number6 profile image
Number6Administrator
Darryl profile image
DarrylPartner

Content on HealthUnlocked does not replace the relationship between you and doctors or other healthcare professionals nor the advice you receive from them.

Never delay seeking advice or dialling emergency services because of something that you have read on HealthUnlocked.