With the FDA approval of Erleada for this indication, I updated my blog about available options for mHSPC. I also included Xtandi in anticipation of its approval soon.
FDA-approved therapies for metastatic... - Advanced Prostate...
FDA-approved therapies for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC)
![Tall_Allen profile image](https://images.hu-production.be/avatars/017e665a21f4bd4ca22c6ca88452d433_small@2x_100x100.jpg)
![Tall_Allen profile image](https://images.hu-production.be/avatars/017e665a21f4bd4ca22c6ca88452d433_small@2x_100x100.jpg)
Couple of things TA. First you say “ only 3% of new patients are newly diagnosed with metastatic, hormone-sensitive prostate cancer”. Is there a difference in treatment between “newly diagnosed” and those who have had primary treatment and are later diagnosed with a recurrence that is metastatic and hormone sensitive? Secondly, from looking at your hazard ratio’s, so far it looks like it’s Xandi is winning the race right?
Schwah
1. Recurrent is different. The STAMPEDE trials include a group of recurrent patients, but the other trials do not. I focussed on newly diagnosed.
2. No -you cannot compare across studies. That's why I wrote: "One should resist the temptation to compare HRs across studies. Each study had different patient characteristics, and PSA screening policies differ markedly in those countries. In fact, a recent analysis of the STAMPEDE outcomes of men who were randomly assigned to either Zytiga or docetaxel found that there was no difference in survival between the two treatments "
I probably should not have shown the HRs - just noted whether the effect was statistically significant. I'll edit when I get a chance. Thanks for bringing up the issue.
Great information, thanks for posting this.