Every time I watch TV interviews of men with prostate cancer, they say my doctor said take it out this includes localised pc and this is how they are treated.Is there a bias towards RP in the UK or is it just that those on tv have had RP.
Gland removal preference: Every time I... - Prostate Cancer N...
Gland removal preference
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e06a5/e06a5427c92c4140ed5f9cc45be9b3cacf88ddf0" alt="pd63 profile image"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e06a5/e06a5427c92c4140ed5f9cc45be9b3cacf88ddf0" alt="pd63 profile image"
I suppose that, like in Sweden, any signs of possible prostate cancer your are always having first meetings with Urologists and if you are diagnosed with localized prostate cancer they recommend you to do prostatectomy as this is what they do and they believe it’s best treatment of course. That’s also why you always should ask for a second opinion with oncologists because they are doing the other curative pathway; radiation in different modalities.
But, had a quick look at stats from UK Gov and it seems like approx 45 % choose prostatectomy depending on the diagnos of course and then approx 30 % choose radiation, give or take👍
Ten years ago I consulted privately with several 'top' docs in London, including at Royal Marsden, on non-surgical procedures. All recommended I have surgery, based on multiparameteic MRI findings; foregoing the private revenues they would have received from me. How unbiased! I had RP back home in Texas, and remain grateful I did. All the best!
There is a bias toward RP everywhere -- the first doctor men see is a urologist and surgery is all they usually know.
Rabbit in the headlights maybe, but can be devastating to be diagnosed and we all react in our own wayMy diagnosis came about due to regular psa tests carried out because of family history so when diagnosed it wasn't a shock but still a bastard to deal with.
I had the advantage knowing my brother had EBRT following his diagnosis 13 yrs ago, no SEs, no recurrence so that I influenced my decision to have RT/SBRT.
Time will tell if it cures but if it doesn't I won't regret it, gotta live with it
Both my initial urologist and the specialist surgeon recommended radiation in my case. I had an initial preference for surgery but they "talked me out of it"!
I guess it depends a lot on staging and individual doctors.
Hi !
My personal impression, from Sweden at least, is that the majority is consulted into prostatectomy and there is definetily no good overlaping between Urologists and Oncologists to help the patient have a good dialouge before deciding on the best choice for them. If that’s the case in UK I of course don’t know but hope it’s better.
With that, I have of course full respect for those who choose the prostatectomy path and the statistics show very good results from my point of view 👍
I think it's a scandal that too often men in the UK NHS are recommended RP. I was one and as I walked in to see the urologist, he said he could see I was fit and a good candidate for RP. He said this to another friend who had RP and subsequently developed mets 3 years later. Fortunately I decided to look at the options and after a 1 hour consultation with an oncologist decided that RT + ADT was the way.
The "just cut it out" reaction seems to persist with some surgeons, though at least in the U.S. the more knowledgable ones are more nuanced. And from a patient perspective, with such news as "you have prostate cancer" the reaction is understandable.
TA, as usual, has good advice. You have some time. Take a deep breath. Do research. Depending on the specifics of your situation RP MAY be a good option. In my case (G 4+5, isolated to gland) it was pretty clear that the better long-term outcome was with ADT, EBRT, and Brachy. AND I would not have to worry about QOL long-term side effects.
Research. Talk to a surgeon, a radiation oncologist, and a medical oncologist. Best wishes.
After an MRI confirmed my cancer diagnosis, the first specialist I saw was a surgeon, gung ho on taking it out. But due to departmental policy, he had to refer me to a radiologist. This one said the best route would be the least invasive, ie radiology. I expressed my confusion and was invited to meet the HoD. He was also a surgeon, and told me that with my diagnosis, that I was Gleason 4+3 at stage T3b, he would recommend that, if I did opt for surgery, then he would recommend follow up radiology. So both treatments.
In the end I chose radiology, but this does go to prove I think that a specialist will normally choose his own specialism, and it's important to do your own research to see what's best for you.
Urologists are almost always surgeons so 109% will say surgery best option.Get a medical oncologist and a radiation oncologist opinions also then you will have a fully informed choice.
I met with both an oncologist and a surgeon. Neither was touting for business and both said there was an equal chance of dealing adequately with the cancer. The decision was entirely mine with no attempt to influence either way. I decided on RP but unfortunately was not one of the guys who recover fully from the incontinence side effects. However, I have a friend who had hormone and radiotherapy and he has issues with the bowel. Another friend had brachytherapy and he has a stricture requiring self catheterization every morning . Everyone's experience is unique and personal and while it is helpful to read the experience of others there is no guarantee that your outcome will be the same
'Invasion of the Prostate Snatchers' by Dr Scholz should be required reading for anyone in a rush to 'just cut it out'.