Why can’t stonycreek get replies - says he was kicked off?
Stonycreek: Why can’t stonycreek get replies - says... - PMRGCAuk
Stonycreek
Written by
Daffodilia
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
7 Replies
•
Morning Dadfodilia
Stonycreek wasn’t getting his Daily Bulletin & he wondered why?
Remember a couple of weeks ago people weren’t getting the DB as they were doing an upgrade on the Main HU Site. He just wasn’t aware there had been an issue.
Thanks
MrsN
Daffodilia in reply to
ok
PMRproAmbassador
She certainly hasn't been "kicked off" as you put it - as MrsNails says, it is probably due to the issues discussed a few weeks ago.
I explained what to do in a reply yesterday - and if you think about it logically, if you have been kicked off then you can't get onto the site to post or send pms.
It looks like stonecreek has been replying to old posts. This often means no one sees them. It is important to glance at when the post was made, a 3 month or 5 day old post may not be seen by others.
PMRproAmbassador
To add to the comment Poopadoop has just made - if someone replies to even a relatively recent post in the middle of an internal thread notifications aren't sent out generally if there are later replies. I know it sound complicated but that is how the forum is set up. If someone didn't follow or reply to the post at the beginning they won't hear about it again.
DorsetLadyPMRGCAuk volunteer
He’s a she actually - if you look at profile you’ll see she’s been active, and did raise the problem of access/notifications about a month ago - which hopefully was addressed. But maybe not!
What I want to know is why don't people raise it direct with the Moderators when they THINK someone has been "kicked off" instead of just starting a new thread.
Posts and people are not 'kicked off' lightly.
