My severely mentally handicapped sister aged 62 has been in permanent care since the age of three.
Since the early 1990's when the mental hospital where she was a patient closed, she has been marvelously cared for in all aspects by a charitable Trust whereby she has 24 hour care in a specialised home.
As regards her finances she has always relied on benefits, and has never had any other source of income. She receives income support and disability living allowance, and her finances have always been looked after by the Trust under Appointeeship.
The Trust has always exercised exemplary fiduciary duty in her best interests, but the following issue has arisen.
The local authority's adult services essentially fund her care, directly to the Trust. It also audits the finances concerning her own bank account - that purchases and outgoings on her behalf are properly recorded and receipted. It is now however claiming that the Trust does not have a "legal framework" to deal with her finances. This is despite it having done so for over 25 years, and that the DWP payments to her bank account and the Trust's management of it still successfully operate together.
The local authority is pushing for relatives to be involved, and I would happily do so. However it is also saying that application should now be made for Deputyship i.e. via the Court of Protection. This would entail expenses, including solicitor's fees, that are totally out of proportion to what modest savings the Trust has diligently accrued for her, and to her net income. The local authority clearly perceives that the Mental Capacity Act invalidates the long-standing Appointeeship arrangement that has been in place. As mentioned, her sole income has always only been from benefits, and as such I understood that Appointeeship is perfectly acceptable.
I would be very grateful if a definitive view could be given for this situation.