Some undisputable facts and conclusions following the thread "is levadopa neuroprotective?"
1. Levadopa is NOT directly neuroprotective
2. Long term use of levadopa leaves some very unpleasant, awful side effects
3. Regular rigorous EXERCISES (with a happy optimistic mind) IS neuroprotective and slows down progression
4. "Drugs holiday" do not improve the efficacy of levadopa or reduce it's side effects
In that thread i asked "what would be the difference in 20 years between a PwP taking only C/L and a PwP not taking anything?"
So based on these 4 points, my conclusion to this question is-: if PwP NOT taking c/l can be motivated sufficiently enough to get involved in full regular rigorous exercises, as a starting point, then a "feel better feedback loop" is sufficient to make these PwP do MUCH BETTER than those taking c/l after 20 years because they won't have the added long term awful side effects of levadopa which, on it's own right, people consider an illness
Someone said "you only do better on levadopa because you feel good enough to do alot of exercises". But can't we find the motivations to do as much exercise without levadopa... in other words getting the best of both worlds... Not good news for the drug companies
For many people with Parkinson's, some levodopa is a necessity in order to be able to exercise.
What of if they begin the regular rigorous exercise at very early stage of PD, before they begin to freeze up. I'm not saying PD would still not progress, but suggesting it would progress more slowly and you will be able to get on top of it if started early enough.
Not disputing your point entirely, but just a path of action I'm suggesting PwP (whatever the subtype) to consider
Honestly. I exercised like an athlete but I don’t feel that it slowed the disease and strangely didn’t often make me feel better 😕
PD affects each individual differently and progresses at its own pace. Many patients seem to benefit from strenuous exercise.