“Soap and water don't kill germs; they work by mechanically removing them from your hands. Running water by itself does a pretty good job of germ removal, but soap increases the overall effectiveness by pulling unwanted material off the skin and into the water.”
Another fact - viruses are not living organisms, so you don't "kill" something that's not alive but they do carry genetic materials and reproduce/evolve opportunistically.
A little flaw in the design of the universe and eternity ? They are not even a single cell and yet they evolve and find a cell to enter , appropriate what they need and kill the cell, replicate and make others and they are not alive . Why, to what end , what purpose? Well , it turns out you could ask the same thing about humans and get exactly the same answer. It all reminds me of the movie Men in Black. Our whole universe makes up and is actually a ball on a billard table . The virus being made of things so small that we will never even know about them.
We know what is the smallest thing you say ? No , we are water and dust and electrical energy and understand almost nothing. Yet there is this unstopable drive to live, to evolve and to understand . A free for all fight with the last thing left standing being the winner so it can all go down a giant black hole and start again. All of our joy, tears , knowledge , understanding and beliefs, effort, and evolution and life , and our very short existence will eventually end by making a very small poof , that is observed by nothing . Gone forever in the vastness of eternity, just a poof. Now , that is funny.
It depends on whose vantage point. If you could somehow poll all other "living" things on this planet, it'll be found that humans are the most destructive of all. Things unknown, viruses, etc. enforce healthy fears and perhaps divine interventions of sort to balance out matters. Viruses were the true heroes in the War Of the Worlds : D.
I feel nothing when I kill nuisance mosquitoes/flies but they probably have their own right to be on this earth. Make it count, contribute, and leave positive legacy while you can, whether it be out of faith or fear.
We have more viruses and bacteria in our bodies than one would think. All this anti*bacterial sanitizing is a waste of time and money, and I believe, harmful. We need viruses and bacteria. We tend to be too clean.
It's true that some germs provide symbiotic health benefits and help strengthen our immune system through exposures, but I wouldn't say sanitizing is a waste of time when you could easily get overwhelmed and deathly sick by myriad dangerous germs.
We clean, but never sanitize. I will use vodka, and in the bathroom we use hydrogen peroxide. Neither of us have a cold or flu for years. For me, it was 1998. For George, I think it was longer. High doses of Vitamin D.
Some of the viruses infecting humans are indeed capable of causing severe and often lethal diseases, but other viruses can be manipulated to be beneficial to human health. These viruses offer the potential to cure cancer, correct genetic disorders, or fight pathogenic viral infections. In addition, viruses are used in many genetic studies to determine molecular mechanisms, are used as insecticides, and have been reported to increase drought tolerance in some plants. Virologists must strive to downplay the “bad” reputation of viruses and promote dialogue on the many “good” things that they can do.
We don't need viruses. They are there. " On an average, healthy individuals carry about five types of viruses in their bodies and the same viruses that make us sick can take up residence in and on the human body without provoking a sneeze or cough." thehealthsite.com/news/ever...
Build up the immune by eating organic food, and taking lots of vitamin
I was tested when I was taking 5,000 IU's. The blood test didn't register any Vitamin D. I increased it to 10,000 a day, and in the winter, or when I don't get 15 minutes of sun a day, I take 20,000. My doctor says that's fine. I have also read where you can take up to 60,000 IU's safely. My sister had breast cancer. I believe I read years ago most women with breast cancer had low vitamin D levels. She takes 20,000 IU's.
OAKLAND, Calif. — Women with higher vitamin D levels in their blood following a breast cancer diagnosis had significantly better long-term outcomes, according to new research from Kaiser Permanente and Roswell Park Cancer Institute. The study was published online today in JAMA Oncology.
Vitamin D is a nutrient best known for its role in maintaining healthy bones; conversely, vitamin D deficiency has been associated with the risk for several cancers.
The key is that you're being monitored by your Dr watching the serum level of vitamin D and you obviously have D absorption issue or your kidneys can't readily covert to useful active form to be on an extremely high dosage. It's probably best to qualify your statement than possibly having others follow your protocol to detriment.
We trust our doctor. When George recently had an appointment, he asked me how much vitamin D we were taking, because it is so important in building the immune. I told him George takes 5,000 and I take 10,000 in the summer when I get in the sun for 15 minutes, and 20,000 in the winter. He acknowledged that was good. My sister, who has had 2 different cancers, now takes 20,000 iu.
Content on HealthUnlocked does not replace the relationship between you and doctors or other healthcare professionals nor the advice you receive from them.
Never delay seeking advice or dialling emergency services because of something that you have read on HealthUnlocked.
Problems with Supplements
Electric Hand Massager
Has anyone read this article...sounds promising
High Dose Thiamine (HDT)—How critical is the sweet spot?
BEWARE! RED LIGHT experiment FAILED! Don't get RIPPED OFF!
