From previous post where dr wouldn't do scan as elf was under 10.5, which nice guidelines do state, but my concern was my drs think anything upto 10.5 is completely normal range with no other references, I did book a private ultrasound last week which showed nothing at all with my liver not even any fatty liver, report said ( liver normal size, outline and echotexture with no obvious focal lesions identified.no evidence of intra or extra hepatic duct dilatation noted.thin walled Well distended gallbladder appear free of calculi.CBD not dilated.head pancreas appears grossly normal, both kidneys outline normally good corticomedullary differentiation, no renal calculi hydronephrosis, normal appearance abdominal aorta and spleen)
I havint a clue what most that means except nothing with liver picked up, but I heard ultrasound can struggle with any fibrosis below advanced.
I have also contacted my Dr for his take on why 10.1 to him is normal and this is his reply or some of it to my email(The normal range for the Enhanced Liver Fibrosis (ELF) test is 0-10.50. Please reassure the patient his ELF score of 10.1 is within the normal range and is not indicative of severe liver fibrosis)
So as you see I was right that they are saying this is normal unless test comes in at 10.51 surely that wrong, this was my only worry before not so much as people said here the Dr won't send for scans as it's below 10 51 which he won't but the references they are using, and as you can see are saying 10.1 my score is actually normal, when it's not, Sorry about the long read.