For most of my adult life I've enjoyed cycling for leisure - very much a tourist type cyclist. Even my bike of choice (Dawes Super Galaxy) is a tourist bike so speed has never been my thing.
The last few years have brought about a reduction in cycling and and increase in weight due to arthritic knees and now a heart conditon.
My breathing is now back to where it was before last June so I have decided to get back cycling. This time, I thought I would treat myself to one of thsoe Garmin Cycling Computers and a Heart Monitor Chest Strap.
Yesterday, I undertook my first ride, and according to all the evidence, I burned up some 900 calories in a 90 minute ride covering some 13 miles at under 10mph average speed. I am a tad wary of that figure at the moment and need to do some research - because if accurate, it means I have a little wiggle room with my efforts to lose the excess weight via a calorie controlled diet!
Well, about 900 calories
It is not me saying i can enjoy another 900 calories worth of food and drink, merely that i can afford to eat 50 more calories than the daily limit if the much better option presents itself for 50 calories more!
The real question has to be:
Is this an accurate figure? Seems an awful lot to me - but then I've never had need to monitor my heart or my calories for most of my adult life.