I have just been given a diagnosis of Microvascular Ischaemia and Angina, after two years of fighting for a diagnosis. I was advised to seek a second opinion, and I did just that, going to Papworth in Cambridge, who have finally delivered on a diagnosis. I do feel that women have a difficult time trying to get help with cardiac conditions, mainly because we sometimes experience heart symptoms in a different way to men. Can I just encourage any woman who has been told there doesn't seem to be much wrong, to seek a further opinion and not give up!
Written by
iggytiggy
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
I agree fully, as data show that women patients do better under women cardiologists, whereas there is no difference between male and female cardiologists when it comes to male patients.
....but, it took male me 10 years to obtain a diagnosis of microvascular angina and in the first instance I had to make the diagnosis myself. So hang on in there everybody!
I had all the tests in the world and all came back negative. I discovered microvascular angina purely by chance when applying for travel insurance, mentioned it to my GP (twice) and I think he then passed it on to the cardiologist. I'm not sure she had heard of it until then!
I read more than once that something like 30%+ of angina sufferers show no blockages in the main arteries. It seems bizarre that with that many people with the condition more of those in the medical profession don't seem to have heard of MVA.....
Content on HealthUnlocked does not replace the relationship between you and doctors or other healthcare professionals nor the advice you receive from them.
Never delay seeking advice or dialling emergency services because of something that you have read on HealthUnlocked.