TODAY I find myself asking serious questions looking for answers following my own research.
HERE GO's .. DO none smokers need oxygen before smokers when it comes to lung diseases ... I would say the DO.
WHY do I say that SMOKERS operate on lower oxygen threshold .. Our cells have three missing ATOMs in none smokers our environment or oxygen therapy fills the gap of those missing ATOMs.
But some say the very destructive and causes cells to mutate other's say it's part of LIFEs ageing process SO is that why none smokers fair worser than smokers WHEN it comes to lung dieasee and hypoxia.
Have read of link.
livescience.com/3093-smokin...
In SMOKERs the missing ATOMs I have talked about in none smokers are APPEASED by CO2 carbon monoxide thus are not as destructive and operate at lower oxygen freehold demand SO when it comes to lung filters WHAT would seem best.
A body that can operate at lower oxygen demand given diseased lungs OR one that try's to operate on high oxygen demand given diseased lung's
Here is video that explains things further.
youtube.com/watch?v=47u3-Ga...
As usual these are my thoughts scratching AND I would advise anyone to give up smoking myself included.
But it would be interesting to here from anyone on oxygen therapy who as had more celular problems since starting oxygen.
Further reading : ucsdnews.ucsd.edu/archive/n...