For anyone going for one of these it really was ok and certainly not a painful experience
They found that I had a extra pulmonary vein so it was a bit complicated and the surgeon said they did a good work around.
Everything was going fine which was bliss! but just after 12 weeks, I had my first AF episode lasting about 12 hours. Then 10 days later according to the monitor reading a more regular atrial tachycardia episode. Again lasting about 12 hours.
Never had Atrial tachycardia before the ablation, but reading on here it does happen.
The consultant thinks that one of the veins may have reconnected, so I am waiting for a 2nd ablation. Which will be a RF ablation. NHS, so just have to wait and strikes will probably push it back.
Written by
CDAJ
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
Another way of looking at it is that it hasn’t finished disconnecting and may do so as the scarring develops, as is said on here some are still improving a year or so later and the 3 month blanking period is not a fixed point, we’re all different.
Very interesting experience. Many thanks for sharing. It's worth remembering that PF ablation for AF is not necessarily more effective than regular RF ablation and has its own complexities. The only real advantage is that it's supposed to be safer than RF ablation but only if done properly. Can I ask why the second ablation will be RF? My own opinion is that ablation for AF is a waste of time. If I suffered from AF I would look into the mini maze procedure.
Content on HealthUnlocked does not replace the relationship between you and doctors or other healthcare professionals nor the advice you receive from them.
Never delay seeking advice or dialling emergency services because of something that you have read on HealthUnlocked.