Deb it never did for me. I have had two in the last twenty years with no issues. The only possible problem may be if you are allergic to the contrast they use. Bottom line is that you need this test to make sure that your arteries are fine and your heart structure is good so what will be will be and the alternative may not be so great. It will help them decide what treatmetn is appropriate.
I have been so concerned with af hadn’t really thought about the consequent of not having it.🤔
Not sure if this will help Deb, but most of us are aware that a cardioversion is not a cure for AF. However, if successful it is an important marker should AF ever return because you are more likely to have a successful outcome with other treatment such as an ablation. So I would take comfort from BobD’s advice in the knowledge that the procedure is unlikely to cause a problem. Should the situation change at some time in the future, you are likely to be well placed for a good result. Good luck with the angiogram.......
I am also a very anxious individual, too - it's no fun, is it? And yet, I always welcome investigations that will help me to be healthier, such as the one you're being offered. An angiogram will really help your doctor to know how best to look after your heart.
More commonly, these days, you'll be given a stress cardiac MRI (CMR) rather than a traditional angiogram. This is something that I'd ask about if I were you. Here's a good study that explains why the MRI is a better choice for many patients (but not all - your doctor will know best, of course):
Poor you. That’s a shame. The noisy tunnel and the time involved aren’t wonderful but I gather that the test is the absolute gold standard for checking every aspect the heart and, that article suggests, also rather safer than a traditional CT angiogram.
A CT scan uses a tunnel, too, but it is far quicker to carry out. Can’t you ask for mild sedation maybe?
I think humans are all “irrational”; it’s just that we’ve come up with the idea that being “rational” is somehow better, even though only machines like computers are actually rational.
I also suspect that many people feel the fear; it’s how much they feel and what they do with it that makes anxious people different.
I was thinking that sedation wouldn’t work as they need to see your heart working quite hard and also you need to hold your breath at various times while they scan you.
It’s a great shame for you that you can’t find a way around this as your future, in a way, is in your hands inasmuch as the quality of information the doctors can get about your heart will determine how well they can treat you, if treatment is needed. And a stress MRI is the gold standard of providing that information.
I’m a sufferer from anxiety, too, but for some reason, I’m more anxious about being ill than being examined. Mind you, the last two scans I had, I feared so very much that bad news was coming my way. My fears truly made me almost ill, but in the end proved groundless.
Hi Deb, I too am super anxious. I got myself worked up before my mri in January. However i just shut my eyes and the time passed really quickly. It was so much easier than i thought.
Hi Deb, I did have an angiogram and it didn't put me into AF...of course, as we are all different you may consult your cardiologist about your concerns...or ask your GP and then relax...good luck...you will be OK
I had a CT angiogram to make sure I was able to start the drug Fleconide with no problem with my AF and I also have anxiety problems. It was fine so I wouldn't worry about it if I were you. Good luck.
I had a CT Angiogram just a few weeks ago. They injected me with a short acting beta blocker to slow my heart rate which they assured me was a common procedure prior to injecting the marker dye as I was suffering paroxysmal AFib at the time. It was fine and a couple of weeks later my cardiologist used the Angiogram to adjust my medication and give me feedback on the condition of my heart - which was much better than I had anticipated. Like you I was anxious but the outcome of this procedure has been positive and I would reassure you it’s worth having it done. I understand exactly how you feel and sympathise but would reassure there’s nothing to worry about in terms of this procedure. Best wishes.
I had an angiogram about 9 months ago. Like you I was worried about AF. It was no problem at all. In fact I was in A.flutter when they did an ecg prior to the angiogram and SR afterwards. Don’t worry they will look after you. Best wishes ☘️
You must be young. I can't see an old heart working that well. I was 3 months persistent , and my cardioversion lasted only three days. But, I was 74 at the time.
For someone who is 22 years older, 55 is young. If it was possible for me, it is definitely possible for you. Because you were persistent, your doctors may discuss ablation with you, hopefully. AF begets AF, the more you will have the more you will get. So, do watch (be on top of your treatment) when the arrhythmia returns because a CV is a bandaid. Wishing you the best.
Content on HealthUnlocked does not replace the relationship between you and doctors or other healthcare professionals nor the advice you receive from them.
Never delay seeking advice or dialling emergency services because of something that you have read on HealthUnlocked.