So if I have this right high risk patients who got RP are put on adt and apalutamide for 12 months and after two years, now with recovered tst none have had a recurrence.
am a little confused on the implications is this simply deferring the recurrence that would occur in the first 5 years after RP anyway? or is the suggestion that the doublet adt has moved some people into a long term durable remission group that would otherwise not be?
Written by
street-air
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
I did not see PSA value for recurrence free determination. I rely on believe <0.010 is the correct value. And, is not the true test years after ADT has stopped?
P2-07 APALUTAMIDE FOR HIGH-RISK LOCALIZED PROSTATE CANCER FOLLOWING RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY IN Apa-RP: A Multicenter, Open-Label, Single-Arm Phase 2 Study
Neal Shore , Jason Hafron , Daniel Saltzstein , Gordon Brown , Laurence Belkoff , Pankaj Aggarwal , Jennifer Phillips , Amitabha Bhaumik , and Tracy McGowan
Approximately 25% of patients (pts) with high-risk localized prostate cancer (HR LPC) experience disease recurrence within 2 years following radical prostatectomy (RP). The Apa-RP study (NCT04523207) investigated adjuvant treatment with apalutamide and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) to determine if this combination improved the biochemical recurrence (BCR)-free rate in participants with HR LPC who had undergone RP, compared with historical data from pts with RP alone.
METHODS:
In this multicenter, open-label, single-arm, Phase 2 study conducted at 27 US community urologic practices, treatment-naïve pts with HR LPC who had undergone RP were treated with apalutamide (240 mg; once daily) and ADT for 12 cycles (1 cycle=28 days). The primary endpoint was confirmed BCR-free rate at 24 months, where BCR is defined as two sequential prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels >0.2 ng/mL. Secondary endpoints included testosterone recovery rate and safety. Modified intention-to-treat analysis set is reported.
RESULTS:
108 pts were enrolled; the median age was 66.0 (range 46.0-77.0) years. The median pre-operative PSA and testosterone at baseline were 7.6 (range 2.2-62.7) ng/dL and 340.0 (range 43.0-939.0) ng/dL, respectively. Confirmed BCR-free rate was 100% at 24 months (90% confidence interval [CI] 93.0, 100.0) (Figure 1A); unconfirmed BCR-free rate at 24 months was 98.4% (90% CI 92.2, 99.7) (Figure 1B). The serum testosterone recovery (≥150 ng/dL) event rate was 76.4% (95% CI 65.0-84.5) at 12 months following treatment completion. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported by 99.1% (n=107) of pts during the study; 22.2% (n=24) were Grade 3 -4, and 14.8% (n=16) were serious AEs. 13.0% (n=14) and 10.2% (n=11) of pts required treatment dose reduction/interruption or discontinuation due to AEs, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS:
The Apa-RP study results suggest that treatment intensification with 12 months of apalutamide+ADT could become an option for patients with HR LPC undergoing RP, based on a 100% BCR-free survival. 76% of patients had testosterone recovery (≥150 ng/dL) 12 months after treatment completion. The safety profile of apalutamide + ADT was consistent with previous reports.
That is for adjuvant treatment with RP. I wonder if the Apalutamide/ADT combo works as well for recurrence -- that Erleada is better than Xtandi, Nubeqa or Abiraterone.
it is silly to draw ANY conclusions from such a short period. Not surprising that no psa detected while on intensive adt for the first year. And in all likelihood there is still a strong adt effect in the second year (since with a year of intensive adt it usually takes at least 6 months for T to come back). No doubt sponsored by the makers of the drugs. Let’s see the impact after 5-10 years.
The title of this silly paper should have been: "Balistic missile launches against irritating sparrows". I am high risk in all accounts (GS 4+5, pT3b). 2.5 years after RP my PSA was 0.17, so not BCR according to their criteria (2 conservative 0.2 readings). Now, 5 years post RP my PSA is hovering the lowest level of detection only by taking 1/10 the normal dosage of Bicalutamide (half a tablet every 5 days).
I, for one, appreciate the information. I don’t think every snippet of info has to be the “holy grail” of prostate cancer research. A lot of the guys on this forum are new to the trenches. Positive articles can be mentally uplifting even if the study does need a few more whiskers to be medically significant. Thanks for posting.
Content on HealthUnlocked does not replace the relationship between you and doctors or other healthcare professionals nor the advice you receive from them.
Never delay seeking advice or dialling emergency services because of something that you have read on HealthUnlocked.