youtube.com/shorts/tSp0V_5N...
I believe this guy is right. They should use more money and effort to determine how the cancer cells are able to growth in tissues that are not the tissue where they came from (metastases). If they could solve that situation perhaps cancer could be cured.
The hopes are that it also works on humans.
But even than, some medicine works better on whites or Asians etc.
Therefore it is important to do proper clinical trials on the native population of the country which would use the medication.
I know it is not simple.
I was laughing on that comedian. That is healthy. Thanks tango65
gee I dunno …. What if we just eat the successful lab rats and see if that works . 😂😂😂
LOL - funny but true. The problem is not the research, it is that mainstream media pick it up, and patients read those articles and studies thinking it applies to humans.
There is a legitimate purpose - screening. If it works in rats, it might work in humans, and may be worth a human trial. If it doesn't work in rats, it can be dropped. It is the first step in a conversation with other researchers, and not meant to inform patients.
It is usually done with xenografts (human tissue) in mice or rats prone to cancer.
What if there's stuff that works on humans but not on rats?
It would show up in human xenografts.
But surely xenographs do not perfectly replicate the human body, thats why human trials are required?
It is used only to eliminate drugs that have no effect.
Back to my original point. What if theres stuff that works on humans but not on rats?
It's human tissue in the rats.
Thanks for the laugh 😁
Funny! I think a cure for cancer has been reported in the media about 1,000 times in my lifetime. And here we still are. 🦊
Many thanks for the laugh tango65.
Social Security Benefits for us
ANOTHER MEMBER, CSHobie (CHARLES) HAS LEFT US FOREVER.
Are Lymph nodes a filter?
How many of you are taking melatonin and how many of you are taking metformin?
