Undetectable PSA and fairly clean bone scans and CT’s. Still my Onc at Mayo has me doing a PSMA on Wednesday.
Thoughts?
Undetectable PSA and fairly clean bone scans and CT’s. Still my Onc at Mayo has me doing a PSMA on Wednesday.
Thoughts?
From all I’ve heard and read a PSMA scan is a waste unless your PSA is north of 0.5.
Slim as it may be, there is always a possibility that something will be detected. In the case nothing is detected you have got a baseline imaging for future comparesions. A win-win situation in my view.
Pretty useless.
I did one when psa was .6 and it found nothing. I did another one at 1.8 and found many LN involvement.
Different scan but I'm having an MRI on April 30th to check what I look like "clean". My PSA has fallen from 10.79 to 0.06. The doctors have previously mentioned extensive lymph node involvement and spread to the bones.
Suggest you ask "why" when PSA below 0.5 that scan detects little.
I’m sure he has his reasons, but the best logic I’ve ever heard on the subject is ‘don’t look for something that if found won’t change your treatment’.
To this end, the question in your case seems to be whether your MO is planning to zap (spot radiate) whatever might be found. You’re already on a drug combo that is working great, so what else is there? Personally I’d not be into foraging with a undetectable PSA in your situation, but you may think differently.
PSMA PET has been widely available in Australia for around 6 years and is not very expensive if ordered by a medical practitioner - your out of pocket cost would be about $US 300, and that would be picked up by your insurer if you had decent coverage.
With that as background - my MO and RO, both researchers at Peter Mac, Australia’s premier cancer research institute, ordered a scan before eSRT at PSA = 0.12, and then another a year later when AADT finished and PSA was undetectable.
Their explanation was that it’s worth being sure that there are no localised PCa accumulations that may be able to be imaged, despite the low PSA.
The bottom line is that once the technology is widely available at moderate cost, it seems to get a fair bit of use - the associated radiation dose is judged to be justified despite the low probability of detecting anything.
Not sure if this helps you - clearly the US is at a different stage of PSMA PET evolution. But it may help you see past cost factors.
Not sure who your Dr is, but if its Dr Kwon Mayo Rochester, I would take the scan, he is not a for profit Dr. quite the opposite he's a scientist and truly cares about each patient's outcomes. Just sayin from experience, he's Brilliant and always on the leading edge .If he's not your Dr. Then make an appointment ASAP you can thank me later
Good Luck and stay healthy.. Diagnosed in 2010 , Fighting this beast for 12 years .
I was just going to write about the same thing. On the road 8 years..
I saw Kwon from 2014-2018, he saved my life. We moved to PHx now seeing Bryce. Cant say enough good about Euge.
Yes all doctors at MAYO I would expect all MAYOs but don't know that. But at MAYO Rochester MN are on salary, they are not getting paid more for each procedure they prescribe.
They ate being thorough
Not necessarily a waste. PSA and cancer volume are not always directly correlated.
Do it. It will show cancer cells previously undetectable. Mine was 0.47
You need to define undetectable please. At Mayo my impression is that the standard test is to 0.1 and read out as undetectable if not detected at or above this level. So to see value below this would need ultrasensitive test. Also as I commented below my personal experience was my PSMA scan was positive at 0.5 and helped direct therapy.
Mayo performs the Choline or PSMA scan at very low PSA for this reason.
A percentage of Mayo PC patients about 5 to 8 percent have PC that progresses regardless that their PSA is not increasing.
So this scan that is being prescribed is to determine if you fall unto that percentage of patients.
So it's not to find PC if your not in that group, only if your in that group.
If you were in that group your actual PC could be progressing and your thinking your fine because nothing is happening with your PSA.
They are basing treatment around the PC not the PSA in this case.
yes, reminds us all that not all PCa cells are high volume PSA producers!!! some of us might need to remind our Docs of that??? I think we are out of the SOC guidance area?
Well said. I seem to be in that 5 to 8 club. My PSA is tiny, yet C11 and PSMA scans (they nearly matched but in case the C11 showed slightly more cancer than the PSMA) reveal cancer that's out of proportion to what my PSA suggests. At Mayo they're vigilant about this.
Thank you gentlemen.
Doctor's mortgage payment is due....
Good Luck, Good Health and Good Humor.
j-o-h-n Tuesday 04/05/2022 10:48 PM DST
I just had my first PSMA scan done this last Friday, and I was glad the doc recommended it. My last MRI in September showed my cancer undetectable, and PSA <.10 . He figured if this scan cames out clear, then I'm in the clear and go off everything. And results show I'm in the clear!
What a coincidence too, we use the same Doc - Bryce.!
Best to you!
Dave
Is increase of LDH and bone-ALP likely for those 5 to 8 percent with PC that progresses without psa increase?
That's what I would think. If they are significant rises. along with possibly, AST and ALT, and fibrinogen. Perhaps Chromagranin-A
Thanks.Why would AST and ALT tend to go up?
So what did your scan show? Was it the Pylarify scan?Thanks