22,446 members26,185 posts

interesting read on benifit and the archbishop (in

.Archbishop of Canterbury condemns benefit changes The Most Reverend Justin Welby said struggling families would be hard hit Continue reading the main story

Related Stories

Archbishop sorry for abuse 'failing'

Evictions warning over benefits

Raise benefits by inflation - Labour

The Archbishop of Canterbury has backed a group of bishops who have written an open letter criticising government plans to change the benefits system.

They said it would have a "deeply disproportionate" effect on children.

The Most Reverend Justin Welby's move came after 43 bishops wrote the letter to the Sunday Telegraph.

The Department for Work and Pensions said tough decisions were necessary in order to keep the costs of welfare sustainable in the long term.

Civilised society

The letter from the Church of England bishops called on politicians to protect children and families whom they said were being hit hard by cuts.

Continue reading the main story

Start Quote

Politicians have a clear choice. By protecting children from the effects of this bill, they can help fulfil their commitment to end child poverty.”

End Quote

The Most Reverend Justin Welby

Archbishop of Canterbury

It has been supported by Dr Welby and the Archbishop of York, the Most Reverend John Sentamu.

In a statement from Lambeth Palace, Dr Welby said a civilised society had a duty to support the vulnerable, especially when times were hard.

He added that planned changes to the benefits system, which would cap rises in welfare payments to 1% for the next three years, would exact a large price on families who were already battling to make ends meet.

Dr Welby said: "Politicians have a clear choice. By protecting children from the effects of this bill, they can help fulfil their commitment to end child poverty."

The statement is Dr Welby's first major intervention in political life since he was named in his new role in November. He is due to be formally enthroned at Canterbury Cathedral on 21 March.

'Hardship penalty'

The Welfare Benefits Up-rating Bill will be debated in the House of Lords next week.

This prompted the bishops to write to the Sunday Telegraph, saying they were concerned that 200,000 children could be pushed into poverty.

The bishops said: "Children and families are already being hit hard by cuts to support, including those to tax credits, maternity benefits and help with housing costs.

"They cannot afford this further hardship penalty. We are calling on the House of Lords to take action to protect children from the impact of this bill."

Face-to-face meeting

The newspaper said his intervention would come as a blow to Work and Pensions Secretary Iain Duncan Smith who is attempting to guide the reforms through Parliament.

BBC political correspondent Ross Hawkins said Dr Welby and Mr Duncan Smith met face-to-face within the past week and a government source said the issue did not come up.

Our correspondent said it was quite clear that Church and State would have plenty more to say to each other on this.

A Department for Work and Pensions spokeswomen said: "In difficult economic times we've protected the incomes of pensioners and disabled people, and most working age benefits will continue to increase 1%.

"This was a tough decision but it's one that will help keep the welfare bill sustainable in the longer term.

"By raising the personal allowance threshold we've lifted two million people out of tax altogether, clearly benefiting people on a low income."

3 Replies

This is going to be an interesting debate and it would bring me great joy if the Tories have to back pedal once, and this time again on an important issue.

Unfortunately, I don't agree with Ed Balls statement that he is against reviewing the universal benefits for all pensioners.

I would agree that benefits to pensioners should be means tested. For example, free bus passes are given to everyone over 60, also heating allowance to pensioners on high incomes. Especially where heating allowances are sent to pensioners living in Spain. This money could be better used and redirected to the low income working population.

High income pensioners should not need a free bus pass. This should be given to help people on low income to attend interviews or to commute to their jobs. This should also be redistributed to people with disabilities, for example to people with RA, who are on low income and are having problems with their knees and feet but have to fork out a lots of their income on bus passes.

This is only my opinion.


I think I agree with you June. I feel very sceptical about things that are applicable to the whole population - such as free prescriptions and tuition fees in Scotland. Its just populist guff - there's always a price to be paid but its just hidden better. Give benefits to those who actually need them. I don't trust any of the current parties to think that sensibly though. TTx


Many people who get the heating allowance and don't feel they need it give it to charity because they would rather that their money goes directly to older people who could use it than go back into the government.

I feel extremely sceptical on the figures that are pushed around regarding disability claimants who are not eligible but get it, so many people whom i know have been taken off it, not ra related, and they really need it. I would much rather they would focus their attention on people who work whilst claiming benefits and weathly individuals who hire accountants to help them not pay what they are entitled to pay.

But in saying all that, I do think that the vast majority of all people are good, kind, deserving and charitable