How much money does digital technolog... - NHS England: A Ca...

NHS England: A Call to Action

407 posts

How much money does digital technology and services like NHS Choices save the NHS? Is it worth the taxpayer outlay?

nhsfan profile image
8 Replies
Written by
nhsfan profile image
nhsfan
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .

The ability to reply to this post has been turned off.

8 Replies
Jaarlsen profile image
Jaarlsen

IMHO two very different things: The value of NHS Choices is becoming more and more obvious just from the numbers and growth and the high standard of patient-centred information. It does what it says on the tin. It's much better than WebMD/NIH and should be targeted to be the best, most trustworthy health site on the web (FYI - I'm not associated with Choices)

On the other hand the blocker on much of the digital innovation in the NHS seems to be on the adoption by 'real' people. When you scratch beneath the surface there are usually very few users however good the demos may look.

nhsfan profile image
nhsfan

Thanks Jaarlsen. Sounds to me like Choices would be the natural parent to nurture any NHS digital babies.

Jaarlsen profile image
Jaarlsen in reply to nhsfan

Choices as an incubator of public-interest digital healthbabies has an infra-red glow of goodness about it. You'd just want to make sure it's built around what users consider to be useful not just the Department of Health initiative that month.

mattbancroft profile image
mattbancroft

My wife and I found the NHS Choices Pregnancy & Baby Guide to be invaluable while expecting the birth of our son last year. There are many other places to get similar information, but the knowledge that we were getting NHS-approved advice was very reassuring to us.

What exactly is the outlay? We've (hopefully) learnt the £12billion lesson of unfettered white elephant IT budgets, but I've no idea how much NHS Choices costs to run for example.

tfloyd1998 profile image
tfloyd1998

I'm not sure how much they spend, but given the culture and legacy, I'd venture a guess it isn't spent very efficiently. As much as the public doesn't want a privatised NHS, to innovate in spheres that are outside its core competency, perhaps it should setup a ventures arm or similar that invests in and nurtures products that could benefit patients. For a £100bn pa organisation, £100m of investment over 3-5 years is a drop in the ocean that could yield big advances for patient care...

in reply to tfloyd1998

Agree - but the problem with public sector venture arms is they seem to fall between two stools and create a whole new layer of slightly suspect decision-making. The ideal situation might be that 'real' VCs came in with public sector and matched the funding (or something along those lines).

rabbit_6 profile image
rabbit_6

Given the ongoing failure of services such as 111, it seems the digital approach is the way to go. However, a stronger remit to ensure that digital offerings aren't replicating information that is available from reputable sources elsewhere is needed

The ability to reply to this post has been turned off.