Here is more on what I was talking about. Sorry to take so long to get back - I have been having computer and phone issues for days, it seems, and working two jobs. This is more than just promising, for me it is working. I haven't tried the liraglutide (GLP - 1 peptide) yet but I take that so as soon as I figure how to get it in an atomizer safely I'll try that one too.
Mate, its all those scientific words. I was just been ironic about having to look up so many words. I did social sciences at uni. Wish I'd done science.
It is hard. I started out 5 years ago to learn a few things about where my future was going. I didn't like what I read and decided to change it. The hardest part of the whole thing is the words medical scientists use. I've come to the unwelcome conclusion that the purpose of this is simply to keep people from understanding medicine and maintain their position.
Over time it starts to stick and then you find the horrifying part - the medical scientists have e a hard time understanding it also, and the body of knowledge is not nearly as far advanced as they would have you believe.
The prescribing of medicines is the worst. Doctors learn about the medications in vogue while they were in school, and rarely stray from that list. They know the primary symptoms the medicine is effective for, but never the interrelationship with other medications they prescribe. Some of the combinations are deadly - others don't get used because of the bias against older medicines. As an example, during the 4 years before I discovered that my highly variable blood pressure is caused by neuropathy and a lack of dopamine I was prescribed 19 different bp medicines none of which made any difference. I finally started looking for ones which complemented each other and which bad results that I needed. I found 2 older medications, indapamide and guanfacine, to be very good at controlling the ups and downs in my bp. What is truly interesting is that one is the primary treatment for the ADHD I was later diagnosed with and never had an inkling that I had.
It is the same with Parkinson's medications. Every one of those alters far more in your body than just fixing one problem. The levodopa which initially treats symptoms o er time makes them worse. The pramipexole they so easily dispense in reality is a highly addicting drug which most people cannot get off of,and over time alters your thinking and builds compulsions, mostly sexual. I cannot believe that they have known of the connection between Insulin and dopamine for over 40 years and didn't follow it up. The reason it is being kept quiet now is that it is inexpensive and easily producrd. They are in the process of building into it an expensive delivery option.
Big Business with its drive on profits is what is killing the US. It is still the most advanced of all countries but greed is confusing the outcomes of great science . Love your work. Have a near infrared helmet and exploring your intranasal insulin. Hopefully my PD will not progress. Thanks so much for your info. Keep it coming.
Thanks. I am a bit of bull at the gate but reports show no downside to intranasal insulin. I am still looking for an integrative neurologist as the traditional ones tend to only treat the symptoms. I've found an integrative doctor in Brownsville which is 3 hrs north but I've come 1000kms south for poppy time and Christmas so shall check out Brisbane for one.
Content on HealthUnlocked does not replace the relationship between you and doctors or other healthcare professionals nor the advice you receive from them.
Never delay seeking advice or dialling emergency services because of something that you have read on HealthUnlocked.