I have copies of my complete DEXA reports and ancillary data from all of my DEXAs. I highly recommend asking for this information because often the imaging center only gives patients a DEXA summary.
For those who aren't familiar with the BMAD (Bone Mineral Apparent Density) calculator, you can find it at courses.washington.edu/bone...
DEXAs can be wrong for people who are smaller (under 5 feet tall). I'm 4'11" and my wrists are approximately 5.5" around, which suggests smaller bones. I think 6" is the average size wrist for women.
I don't know exactly how to interpret the results from the BMAD calculator. I'm left guessing at what I think it means since I can't find medical professionals who know the answers or can explain various tests etc.
You do have to have your ancillary data to use the BMAD calculator.
Today, I did something that proved to be oddly interesting.
If you go to the BMAD calculator link listed above, in the notes below the calculator, you can read how, because DEXAs can't detect the depth of bones, they don't measure true bone density, they "measure" "areal" density.
I've had a total of 5 DEXAs. Today, I plugged my DEXA data into the BMAD calculator for each DEXA and took screenshots and compared the results side by side. Again, I have never really been able to figure out how to interpret the BMAD calculator results, but if you look below the calculator near the bottom of the gray box it states:
"The following calculations used the "block method" described by Bachrach, with a smaller database. This was the method used in the previous BMAD calculator."
If you have plugged in your ancillary data and select CLICK to calculate BMAD the calculator will return results for BMAD for spine L2-4 and Fem neck BMAD. After I plugged in my ancillary data for 5 DEXAs, 4 of the 5 returned the same Fem neck BMAD of 0.109 with the T-score of -2.3. Note three of those 4 DEXAs were done on GE Lunar scanners and 1 was done on a HOLOGIC.
When I got the results of my 2nd DEXA and read up more, I pretty much self determined that the 1st DEXA done in 2019, had incorrect DATA for my right hip, and it's my 2019 DEXA that, when the ancillary data is plugged into BMAD calculator, returned a different Fem neck BMAD # and T-score. The 2019 DEXA results show 0.12 and -1.9, but again I feel that my hip numbers for my 2019 DEXA were never correct.
My BMAD for spine L2-4 # and T-scores change when I enter the ancillary data for each year. Here's what I'm thinking. Since BMD doesn't calculate true density and someone is having to "measure" the Height and Width of my vertabrae and every year those numbers fluctuate, for example the Area (cm sq.) and my T-scores for my L4 by year (on GE LUNAR DEXAs) are
L4 2019: 8.75 cm sq T-score -4.5
L4 2021: 9.39 cm sq T-score -3.8
L4 2022: 9.03 cm sq T-score -4.1
L4 2023: 10.36 cm sq T-score -4.2
I just don't think the the area of my vertebrae is changing to that degree. I mean I can see losing bone density, like having a sponge get more holes it in, but coming up with a different area every year, that, I'm just not very sure about. Maybe it's miniscule changes but to go from 8.75 cm sq in 2019 to 10.36 cm sq in 2023, that's a 1.61 cm sq difference and I'm not buying it. 1.269 x 1.269 = 1.61.
Anyways this was just sort of an odd sort of analysis of my own data that, if I'm near the mark, seems to suggest that it's easier to measure the area of the femoral neck than it is to measure the area of vertebra, which makes since, but at the same time, leaves a lot of room for error.
If anyone is an expert at interpreting the BMAD calculator result, please let me know. I would love to get some questions answered.