Which machine?: Could someone tell me... - Atrial Fibrillati...

Atrial Fibrillation Support

31,926 members37,926 posts

Which machine?

Coeurdelion profile image
14 Replies

Could someone tell me which is the recommended machine for recording ECG/arrhythmia please?

Written by
Coeurdelion profile image
Coeurdelion
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
14 Replies
Paulbounce profile image
Paulbounce

The Kardia comes highly recommended by forum members - maybe this is best for you. I use a Beurer and have always found it very effective. However the Kardia maybe the right choice for you. Google Kardia and you'll find more details.

Paul

Physalis profile image
Physalis

What do you want to record? The Kardia is fine for recording ECGs.

I like the Apple Watch 5 because it also monitors your heart rate all day and night - about 300 times. I used to put the readings on to a spreadsheet and it was useful for me to see when the episodes of atrial fibrillation started and finished, how long they went on for and how often it happened. The ECGs could be printed out for the doctor too.

Before I got it, I had no idea what was going on and I only bought it for its fall detect feature. Fortunately, I haven't had to use that. The apps are useful too. I wouldn't be without it now even though I am free of AFib. And I will be ready if it comes back!

Coeurdelion profile image
Coeurdelion in reply to Physalis

Thanks for that. Very useful.

Rubymurray25 profile image
Rubymurray25

I use a Kardia and think it is brilliant and on two occasions has really helped with catching the AF early to show the consultant.

Coeurdelion profile image
Coeurdelion in reply to Rubymurray25

Is there just one Kardia machine?

in reply to Coeurdelion

no, there are two, single lead and 6 lead (I think)

Also note that the kardia is recognised by NICE and readings can be used by professionals to help with diagnosis , my GP surgery has one that they loan out to suspected AF patients

Coeurdelion profile image
Coeurdelion in reply to

Thanks Mikee. Very useful.

in reply to Coeurdelion

No worries, happy to help.

They are great for diagnosis and to understand what is going on when you feel the chest rabbit but some people (like myself) can get a bit obsessed and worry about every strange bump on the trace

Rubymurray25 profile image
Rubymurray25

There is a simple version which I have where you just have to place your fingers on the pad and link it in with your phone, all very simple and does the job perfectly. Then there is a 6 lead version which cost more and takes longer to use.

BillCook profile image
BillCook in reply to Rubymurray25

I've just bought a Kardia Mobile 6L ("6 lead") monitor, and it is also very simple to use. The "six lead" name is perhaps misleading, as there aren't any leads at all! It is basically the same device as the basic model, but with an extra electrode on the underside. You place the device on some bare skin on your knee, so that the electrode on the underside is touching the skin, then make contact with the upper electrodes with each hand, and the device automatically transmits data to the Kardia app on a compatible mobile phone. You can also use it in "single lead" mode if you wish, simply using the 2 upper electrodes in the same way as with the basic model.

The 6L cost me £150 instead of £100 for the basic model, but I went for it because the extra electrode enables it to record additional information, which I thought might be useful in the future diagnosis of my problem. I don't know if this will turn out to be be true, but I thought that for £50 it was worth it to me to have that possibility.

I think it's called a 6L because the data gathered mimics that recorded by a traditional 6 lead monitor.

Rubymurray25 profile image
Rubymurray25 in reply to BillCook

Very interesting and many thanks for clarifying the difference, might have to upgrade at some point!

Coeurdelion profile image
Coeurdelion in reply to BillCook

Thanks Bill. Very helpful.

baba profile image
baba

alivecor.co.uk/

tunybgur profile image
tunybgur

I have a HealForce PC80B.

It comes with leads etc but you don't really need them, I just hold it against my chest, make sure of a good connection (drop of water on the contact patch), press the button and it gives an excellent 30s rhythm trace which clearly shows whether the P wave is missing or not. It can hold hundreds of readings in the memory and they can be downloaded to a PC and emailed if required etc.

It does give a brief assessment of the reading but it's better to educate yourself what to look for, and for AF it's the absence or not of a P wave which is clearly visible....or not as the case may be.

I paid about £80 for it on Ebay a few years ago and consider it an excellent investment, my GP was very impressed with quality of the rhythm traces.

Not what you're looking for?

You may also like...

Yet more possible problems with AF which may include meds

Hello all. Please, looking for yet more possible info here on my newely diagnosed AF. When I was...

Has anyone used a TENS machine to stimulate the Vagus nerve via the ear to reduce Afib?

I have Vagal Afib and recently started using a tens machine on my left ear twice daily for 15...

Has everyone had the vaccine and if so which one did they have?

Hi guys. Finally got the vaccine this morning. Just curious if everyone’s had theirs and if so...

which smart watch is best?

I have a Fitbit but I’ve heard that an Apple Watch is better for detecting Afib - wondered if...

Beta Blockers vs. Calcium Channel Blockers - Which causes weight gain?

I have been on the beta blocker Carvedilol for several years now because of high blood pressure and...