More Studies: These studies can drive... - Atrial Fibrillati...

Atrial Fibrillation Support

31,322 members36,990 posts

More Studies

EngMac profile image
6 Replies

These studies can drive one crazy. You think you are doing the right thing and a study comes along that makes you wonder. For those who like reading these, fill your boots.

healio.com/cardiology/arrhy...

healio.com/cardiology/strok...

healio.com/cardiology/arrhy...

healio.com/cardiology/chd-p...

healio.com/cardiology/arrhy...

Written by
EngMac profile image
EngMac
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
6 Replies
MarkS profile image
MarkS

I found the first article most interesting - that dabigatran has a higher bleeding risk that warfarin. As it says in the report: the study prompts “cause for concern because it appears that the bleeding risk for dabigatran is higher than for warfarin and significantly greater than [it] originally appeared at the time of the FDA approval.”

I think there was a lot of pressure from the manufacturer to ensure the results of the trial which led to the approval of dabigatran were as favourable as possible. This has been shown in legal cases in the US.

I don't think the NOACs are actually superior to warfarin in effectivemess. I think there are advantages and disadvantages to each. I think warfarin can be made superior to the NOACs if its concentration in the blood is carefully controled - i.e. through INR control. There is no such test for the NOACs currently. Internal tests at the manufacturer have shown dabigatran to be more effective if its blood concentration is controlled. But that of course goes against the main selling point of dabigatran that it doesn't need testing!

Mark

BobD profile image
BobDVolunteer in reply to MarkS

All very true Mark and valid comments. I am ever mind-full of the adage "This years fact is next years myth" which currently seems to sum up most AF research at the moment. It is still all very new science after all. While knowledge is power too much is an inconvenience.lol

Bob

jeanjeannie50 profile image
jeanjeannie50

Interesting, thank you for posting.

Offcut profile image
Offcut

It does seem to show age is a factor to the different type of anti coag used so maybe they need to look at the advantage to age as well as the bleed risks. Not as has been said there does need to be a test system in place no matter what you are taking!

Be Well

Thanks for sharing

fuzzflyer profile image
fuzzflyer

All drugs. Have a monetary application. And it has been proved beyond all doubt that for instance " statins" have ruined peoples lives!! See the billion dollar settlements against baycol etc etc.. I truly think all modern druga s are very suspect. But I cannot offer a truthful alternative so far!

You may also like...

LAA Ablation and stroke risk

https://www.healio.com/cardiology/arrhythmia-disorders/news/online/%7Bcf58400b-f961-41bd-aebe-72a555

Long-term overtreatment with warfarin raised risk for dementia

yet another study. http://www.healio.com/cardiology/arrhythmia-disorders/news/online/%7Bb3873197-

Another aspirin study

What to believe....

Has anyone been involved in any trials/studies?

clinical trials, testing , studies? I feel like, for the most common heart arrhythmia issue, there...

Low BP in patients with AF may be harmful

of the study is on this site. http://www.healio.com/cardiology/vascular-medicine/news/online/%7B047