Recommended for Radiation at 0.01 - Advanced Prostate...

Advanced Prostate Cancer

21,055 members26,260 posts

Recommended for Radiation at 0.01

jaybojammer profile image
12 Replies

I had RALP in November 2019. Gleason 4-3, right seminal vesicle impacted, lymph nodes all clear. Trimix is working although I'm starting to experience scarring and the "carrot effect."

Now my concern has shifted to the disease itself again as my PSA has started a slow rise.

Ultra-sensitive PSA (LabCorp) was .007 then .006. Subsequently switched to Quest where it was <.02 for a couple of years. The last "less than" score was in Sept 2022. Then in December 2022 it was equal to .02 and now three months later =.03.

Urologist said it's time to start talking about radiation and possibly ADT so I'm off today to see a radiation oncologist for his thoughts.

From what I've been watching on here, it seems the thought process is to wait until .1 before considering further treatments. Doc said he doesn't think a PET scan is needed, but he thought I should hit it hard while it's still in the early stages of PSA rising.

Now comes all the second thoughts, is he being over aggressive, am I too worried about hot flashes and side effects of radiation? Should I wait? Should I hit it hard now like he says and hopefully avoid having it spread? Is there anything else I should be considering?

Feeling overwhelmed again.

Written by
jaybojammer profile image
jaybojammer
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
12 Replies
Justfor_ profile image
Justfor_

My response to the same query here:

healthunlocked.com/advanced...

Tall_Allen profile image
Tall_Allen

Your PSA is way too low for SRT. It is negligible. 3 clinical trials proved that there is no risk in waiting for biochemical recurrence.

tn12 profile image
tn12 in reply to Tall_Allen

That would be 0.1?

Tall_Allen profile image
Tall_Allen in reply to tn12

0.1 or 0.2

jaybojammer profile image
jaybojammer in reply to Tall_Allen

If there is no benefit to starting early, would there be any harm in starting SRT at .03? Other than standard risks associated with radiation? I’m wondering what the odds are for it to stop rising after three consecutive increases versus the odds that I’m going to need treatment eventually.

Just trying to gather as many facts as possible before making a decision.

Tall_Allen profile image
Tall_Allen in reply to jaybojammer

Salvage radiation side effects, especially urinary and sexual, can be considerable. It is a bad idea to get a treatment one doesn't need. Your over-reliance on incredibly low PSA is unfounded.

jaybojammer profile image
jaybojammer in reply to Tall_Allen

I’m getting a second opinion before starting anything but would be interested in reading up on the three clinical trials you mentioned that showed no benefit. Could you point me to them?

Tall_Allen profile image
Tall_Allen in reply to jaybojammer

prostatecancer.news/2019/09...

Hawk56 profile image
Hawk56

Here's my clinical history, a study of one and the heterogenous nature of our prostate cancer and ourselves. For me, my decision point was the clinical data.

First, my history, the GS, surgery, 18 months to BCR, failure of SRT, PSADT and PSAV. All my clinical history data pointed to an aggressive PCa.

Next was the current clinical data. We had four consecutive increases, we had decided to image when there were three or more increases and PSA was above .5.

The "good" news, the Plarify scan showed only a single PLN. The not so good news, we know there is micro-metastatic disease too small to be seen by imaging. So, back on triplet therapy for a defined period.

I will say that the side affects from Relugolix early on have been much less than the same point when I was on Lupron. It's early in the treatment though...

Based on your clinical data, may be to soon to pull the trigger and treat.

Kevin

Clinical History
MNFarmBoy profile image
MNFarmBoy in reply to Hawk56

With some adverse pathology in my pathology report (T3a) following surgery in Dec. 2018, but fortunately PSA below the limit of detection (<0.014 ng/ml) since then, if PSA becomes detectable, I plan to make a list of the best candidates for radiation oncologists and radiation treatment facilities; and also initiate genomic testing of tumor samples, so as to be in position to finalize treatment plans pull the trigger on salvage radiation treatment upon PSA increasing to 0.1-0.2 ng/ml. I wouldn't want to have to rush through the selection process.

Best wishes for successful treatment and a good outcome!

Hawk56 profile image
Hawk56 in reply to MNFarmBoy

Sound plan!

Thanx

Kevin

I am different than most. I say hit the bastard hard and early with all the tools available including systemic treatment like adjunctive chemotherapy. Get the opinion from your medical specialists on micro-metastasis and treatment. Why wait for our cancer to rear it’s ugly head down the road?

GD

You may also like...

MO has not recommended radiation

would my MO not mention radiation as a part of my treatment? The ADT has my PSA down to...

To Radiate (the Prostate) or Not to Radiate (the Prostate): That is the Question.

possible side effects of radiation. So, the decision is mine on whether to radiate the prostate...

PSA slightly up after salvage radiation

slightly rise until in became 0.12 in 2021. In June 2021 in started and 8 week IGRT/IMRT radiation...

Radiation or Not?

much but radiation may help with that. I don't have to do radiation right away but the radiation...

Rising PSA after radiation and ADT

Image guided radiation therapy. These are PSA levels: 0.56 (Sept 2, 2022) 1.6 (Dec 27, 2022) 5.3...