Pathology Question ????: Questions on... - Active Surveillan...

Active Surveillance - Prostate Cancer

664 members373 posts

Pathology Question ????

aceace12 profile image
3 Replies

Questions on pathology report from johns hopkins. .......I had pathology reports from local hospital, 12 core needle biopsy cores were listed a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h, i, j,k,l, cores A, D showed gleason 3+3= 6 .08, <5 %- E, showed atypical rest of cores showed benign......harvard pathology report showed a atypical on A, but gleason 3+3=6 .o8 <5% on D and E... So sense there was a discrepancy I had doctor send to johns hopkins. , They conferred core A , gleason 3+3=6 .o8 <5 on A , E. and G but did not list anything on B,D,F,H,J,L,. but did list C, I, K... benign ... Can anyone explain why they would not list those cores ?????.. He also list the word Atypical in all positive cores I thought that meant they could not determine if that core was cancer ..

Thanks,

David R King

Written by
aceace12 profile image
aceace12
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
Read more about...
3 Replies
EdinBmore profile image
EdinBmore

I'm not a physician. I had biopsies at Hopkins. My report also said, "atypical" for some of the cores. My Hopkins uro said that meant that the cells were "funny looking," but not cancerous. I'd talk with your uro or get in touch with Epstein at Hopkins and get clarification of what the hell they're talking about.

You might want to ask for an "Oncotype Dx" of your most recent biopsy. It's a test that will tell you the likelihood of the cancer being aggressive.

Good luck to you.

EdinBaltimore

aceace12 profile image
aceace12 in reply toEdinBmore

Thanks I will do that .. do they send your biopsies off to do that oncotypde DX ? And who does that an oncologist ??

EdinBmore profile image
EdinBmore in reply toaceace12

Genomic Health, Inc

301 Penobscot Dirive

Redwood Drive, CA 94063

I do not know what type of doc reviews the specimen. FYI: I was dx in 2011 and had the onotypeDX performed in 2014. The results were that I was in the "very low risk" category; "a likelihood of favorable pathology" at 81%. One question to ask is how long is this assessment valid? Basically, how long is it good for?

Things changed in 2018 and I had treatment for my PC.

Hope you have better luck than I did! (Although 7 years of non-intervention was/is fine with me!)

Not what you're looking for?

You may also like...

Upcoming PSA Test

Hi, I'm a 57 year old male, PSA 4.77, Gleason score 6. January biopsy showed 5 cores on left side...
Odnad profile image

Most Recent MRI

Hello everyone, I am 72 and have been on active surveillance for prostate cancer since I was...
ironmanburg profile image

My latest biopsy on active surveillance -- no cancer!

Well, I just had my latest fusion biopsy as part of my active surveillance protocol at MSKCC, and I...

Active surveillance?

I'm not sure yet what the consultant will suggest, appt on 9 October. But biopsy was Gleason 7...
Thetoad profile image

Moderation team

Bethishere profile image
BethishereAdministrator
Number6 profile image
Number6Administrator
Darryl profile image
DarrylPartner

Content on HealthUnlocked does not replace the relationship between you and doctors or other healthcare professionals nor the advice you receive from them.

Never delay seeking advice or dialling emergency services because of something that you have read on HealthUnlocked.