My recent F-18 scan has reported, among other things, this:
— nonspecific localization near the head of the left 2nd rib. No definite bony metastatic pattern; subtle associated sclerosis on CT, SUV 2.0.
With such a low SUV, I’m thinking this is false positive. Is it not true that single spots on a rib are frequently FP?
FTM I had a bike crash a month ago, with a malicious light pole slamming into my left chest. Don’t ask. So, could this account for the sclerosis and uptake?
TIA for any feedback.
Edit: this was a Pylarify PSMA F-18.
Written by
lokibear0803
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
My bad, I misspoke. It was a Pylarify; I was just mindlessly quoting the technician, who mentioned the radioisotope is F-18. I guess other non-PSMA scans (FDG?) also use fluorine-18.
“Mindlessly” b/c my mind basically exploded on reading the rib remark. Thanks for helping me find some remaining fragments.
When people say F18 PET scan, they are usually talking about the fluoride (18) PET scan (sodium fluoride is used, but any ionic fluoride (F18) could be used). It is twice as sensitive for bone metastases compared to Pylarify (which also uses F18 as the positron emitter, but the ligand attaches to PSMA on the cancer cell, which is the important part).
SUV max is always compared to background. Radiologists hunt for correlated images - he found scant evidence for you.
Many reading of lesions in ribs with the PSMA PET/CTs may be false positive unless the SUV value of the lesions is high, IMHO higher than 4or 5. If the SUV is 2 I would request a MRI of the rib to confirm it is a met.
Content on HealthUnlocked does not replace the relationship between you and doctors or other healthcare professionals nor the advice you receive from them.
Never delay seeking advice or dialling emergency services because of something that you have read on HealthUnlocked.