PET results vs MRI: I had an Axumin PET... - Advanced Prostate...

Advanced Prostate Cancer

21,605 members27,052 posts

PET results vs MRI

alephnull profile image
8 Replies

I had an Axumin PET scan a couple weeks ago(it showed mets on spine). Followed by an MRI, it didn't show any mets. A person on a facebook PCa group says, to believe the PET scan, but my Onco says the PET scan can have false positives and that the MRI basically proved it.

What say all of you?

Written by
alephnull profile image
alephnull
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
8 Replies
Tall_Allen profile image
Tall_Allen

You had a PET scan and a CT scan. Axumin picks up metastases, and the CT gives more precise info on where they are. An MRI doesn't prove anything. In fact, Axumin can show mets well before they are large enough to become visible on an MRI or CT, which is why it is used. A biopsy can prove they are bone mets, or if they get smaller on hormone therapy or chemo.

jdm3 profile image
jdm3 in reply to Tall_Allen

Though if they don’t appear to get smaller, it does not mean that they are not resolved. It just means that the scan is showing scar tissue that cannot be differentiated from a malignant lesion.

dac500 profile image
dac500

In October 2018, I had a 3T MRI, which didn't show any metastatic cancer. Then PET scan detected metastatic prostate cancer in many pelvic and abdominal lymph nodes, which was verified by biopsy of one of the lymph nodes.

EdBar profile image
EdBar

Back in February I had an Axumin PET scan to rule out any non-PSA mets. My PSA has been undetectable for nearly 5 years however I’ve been using Xtandi for about 4 years and was experiencing some lower back pain. My local medonc (who is excellent and very knowledgeable) has had patients on long term ADT that had low PSA but an Axumin scan showed mets.

The Axumin scan showed uptake in an area of my spine that required further testing, this was stated in the report prepared by the radiologist. It would have been very difficult if not impossible to biopsy this area, so I had an MRI. It showed further deterioration in my lumbar spine but no active disease. The uptake was likely due to inflammation which can happen with an Axumin scan.

My scan and MRI results were reviewed by both my local medonc as well as Dr. Sartor at Tulane and both agreed with results. Dr. Sartor was also in agreement with following up using an MRI.

Ed

Break60 profile image
Break60 in reply to EdBar

MRI is SOP for spine orthopedic issues but not for spine cancer.

EdBar profile image
EdBar in reply to Break60

Well if Sartor and my local Medonc are good with it so am I.

Fanger1 profile image
Fanger1 in reply to EdBar

Hello Ed,

I am curious what your PSA was at the time of your Axumin scan? Did you get insurance to help cover costs despite the low PSA?

EdBar profile image
EdBar in reply to Fanger1

My PSA was undetectable, Medonc was checking for low PSA cancer since I’ve been on Xtandi for several years. I’m on Medicare.

Ed

Not what you're looking for?

You may also like...

PSMA PET / COMBIDEX MRI

find some help with scans. What is the difference between PSMA PET and Combidex MRI. I think the...

PSMA PET CT versus PSMA PET MRI

would it be best to go with the PSMA PET CT or the PSMA PET MRI? Seems that both are available...

MRI results are in !!!

results today from recent MRI due to bone pain in my upper back . The results say the pain is not...

MRI & PSMA conflicting results

Hello, I have done MRI and 18F PSMA scans. MRI shows: “Newly conspicuous 0.4 cm lesion in the left...

Axumin Pet Scan vs Ga68 PSMA Pet Scan

have any information or opinion about the respective strengths and weaknesses of Axumin Pet Scan vs...