Can we trust AI analysis?: Like many of... - Prostate Cancer N...

Prostate Cancer Network

4,955 members3,087 posts

Can we trust AI analysis?

Mgtd profile image
Mgtd
3 Replies

Like many of you I was faced with two major decisions when I was diagnosed with Intermediate high risk prostate cancer. Surgery vs Radiation and ADT short term vs long term.

In short I chose radiation and short term ADT - 2 months prior to radiation and 4 months post. In addition I chose to have my pelvic area radiated even though there was no cancer showing on the tests. The follow may help some of you decide on the level of ADT.

evidence.nejm.org/doi/full/...

I have two close friends who made different choices years apart.. The first chose no ADT with radiation and the second chose 12 months of ADT after surgery and follow up radiation after PSA rise. I guess only time and luck will tell if that was the correct decision for each of us.

I selected an Intermediate course of radiation of 25 sessions and very honestly I let the radiation oncologist determine the amount of radiation to the prostrate and pelvic area, etc. I had no experience in that area and that is why she was getting the big bucks and spent all that time in residency.

Hope this helps some of you as you move through your choices.

Written by
Mgtd profile image
Mgtd
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
Read more about...
3 Replies
janebob99 profile image
janebob99

Very interesting and relevant post. Why did you choose to do pelvic irradiation? Did y0ou have a PSMA-PET scan? What did it show?

Thanks,

Bob

Mgtd profile image
Mgtd in reply to janebob99

I decided to do the pelvic radiation at the suggestion of my radiation oncologist. I did not have a PSMA test. I had the traditional CT and bone scan combo.

She said after reviewing my history and tests she felt that the possibility of microscopic cancer cells that even a PSMA would not pick up was probably pretty good. In her residency she had good experience with taking a more aggressive approach rather then a wait and see.

She explained that there was a argument to me made for both sides of the issue but she since I did not have a PSMA scan she felt she would prefer to radiate the pelvic area and take the more aggressive approach based on her experience. Honestly that made sense to me so that is what we did.

Long story behind the no PSMA but that is another issue for another day and really that train had left the station by the time I got to the RO and MO. Hindsight is always 20/20. It was time to get on with the treatment.

So far her experience and educated guess have had great results. Hoping it continues.

If I remember correctly I had either 70 or 80 GY to the prostrate and a lesser amount to the pelvic area. Once again she made those decisions.

janebob99 profile image
janebob99 in reply to Mgtd

Thanks. Very interesting. I should get my PSMA-PET report in a few days.

You may also like...

AI and Prostate Cancer

(Active Surveillance, Surgery, multiple types of radiation and other local treatments, ADT, Chemo,...

Treatment Options Analysis Paralysis

benefits of surgery. The path with surgery wouldn't include the hormone therapy and would check my...

PSA after radiation and Hormone therapy prognosis

data on the impact of radiation and short term hormone therapy on Intermediate cancer. If anyone...

New to group; very high PSA; headed for da Vinci surgery

My Oct. 2019 PSA was 59.07. Follow-on PSA was 79,3 with PSA Free of 3.45 and PSA Free % = 4.4%....

Recovery of Testosterone

radiation follow up to the prostrate and pelvic area. As part of that my RO requested a PSA and a T...