They expect that the Oxford AstraZeneca vaccine will be approved today - and they are planning to try to do a million vaccinations a week!
Can they not work out that would mean that it would take about two years to vaccinate the population?
One theory might have been that, once they have vaccinated the old, the vulnerable and the NHS, the problem might be over - but the South African mutation is, I believe affecting younger victims, as well as being more infectious.
If we can organise polling stations for the whole adult population to vote in a day - why can they not vaccinate two or three million a day?
The Covid pandemic is costing billions ¿a month? - so a vaccination program would save a great deal of money.
Written by
S11m
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
Well 68 weeks which is still a long time. But the more vaccinations they do the less the risk to the rest of us so things will improve.I imagine it is not only difficult to produce that much vaccine but also the logistics would be a nightmare especially as we would still have to socially distance. Polling stations are very busy places so you couldn't get as many in there at any given time. All this takes more time.
The Oxford AstraZeneca vaccine is a modified virus, and the Biontec/Phizer vaccine is RNA, which has produced anaphylactic reactions in at least two people.I think that they concluded that anyone who might react to get the vaccine in a hospital - where they ha facilities to cope with any reaction.
My sentiments entirely.or if we must wait 😫😷supply proper masks to the vulnerable .especially vulnerable youngsters who will be last to get vaccine probably .
Content on HealthUnlocked does not replace the relationship between you and doctors or other healthcare professionals nor the advice you receive from them.
Never delay seeking advice or dialling emergency services because of something that you have read on HealthUnlocked.
A walk to the vaccination centre 
The people next in line for Covid Vaccination 📌😱🤗😅🙋