Thanks to twitter users posting slides from the late-breaking ASH 2018 presentation! In all sub-groups IR was better. I presume the dotted vertical line is the indicator of statistical significance.
IR vs FCR - PFS Sub-Group Analysis: Thanks to... - CLL Support
IR vs FCR - PFS Sub-Group Analysis
Written by
avzuclav
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
Read more about...
2 Replies
•
Jm954Administrator
Impressive!
Very interesting data. In fact the solid vertical line is the line of statistical significance. So if the horizontal line (which is the confidence interval) doesn’t cross one then the item is statistically significant. I’m assuming the dotted vertical line is probably intended to refer to clinical significance ie that if the point estimate is further away from 1 than that the difference shown is probably clinically important.
Not what you're looking for?
You may also like...
FLAIR Trial (IR vs FCR) Sign Up
knowing that help is on the way :-)
Best Wishes to All,
Ernest
Late breaking CLL abstract at ASH 2018 (FCR vs IR for untreated younger patients)
https://ash.confex.com/ash/2018/webprogram/Paper120779.html
CONCLUSIONS: The combination of...
Right decision? FCR vs. trial
introduced myself. This is a fantastic very supportive group and I am amazed but the helpful and...
FCR vs imbruvica first line
blue line is treatment free, and the yellow is relapsed/refractory patients. 95.8% of first line...