ART Systematic Review of the Decipher... - Active Surveillan...

Active Surveillance - Prostate Cancer

642 members355 posts

ART Systematic Review of the Decipher® Genomic Classifier in Prostate Cancer

RMontana profile image
0 Replies

Decipher genomic testing can help determine who will not benefit from ADT treatment thereby sparing them from side effects. When combined with SOC testing it increase predictive accuracy for who will have metastisis (MET) by 85-90%. Both biopsy and clinical specimens can be used. I had my Decipher done with my clinical specimen post RP; it was a whopping 0.97 out of 1.0 for risk; it should have come back 0.5 to match my Gleason of 4-3! The Decipher results helped me decide on sRT (salvage radiation) immediately and 2 years of ADT follow up. If nothing else its a good biomarker for your PCa and will help you further refine the visual GS gleason grade you received. I look at GS as the direction your PCa will take and a genomic test as the speed it will travel by.

Highlights: at each minute mark.

Min 2:50; OS Overall survival PCa

-35% died from prostate cancer in 18 years

-30% had no disease

-all high-risk cancer patients

-need for better stratification and risk prediction

Min 3:23; risk stratification

current tools are all used

PSA, Gleason score, T stage, CAPRA and Star CAP

25 to 45% error predictive value

Min 7:10; prognostic indicator.

-decipher is an independent prognostic indicator with high accuracy

Min 7:48; SOC + Biomarkers

-combining provides substantial improvement in prediction

Min 14:40; biomarker test comparison

-top three tests compared

-Decipher is the most robust

-It provides the most evidence

Min 17:25; use of grid signatures

-gene grid report is provided by decipher

-pulls in other genes

-15 to 20 additional included

-Polaris genes are provided

-Doctors should look for concordance between the grid and the decipher prediction

-Grid provides androgen response prediction and will identify patients who will benefit most from ADT

Min 19:03; Best predictive value for test

-determining if the use of hormone treatment will be effective

- sparing men the adverse impacts of ADT when it will not provide additional survival benefit

urotoday.com/video-lectures...

Written by
RMontana profile image
RMontana
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
Read more about...

You may also like...

At age 67 my urologist diagnosed me with prostate cancer (March 5, 2018.)

The cancer is contained within the prostate and is said to be non-aggressive (Gleason = 3+3). The...