Surgery tomorrow at MSK: I last wrote... - Prostate Cancer N...

Prostate Cancer Network

4,930 members3,070 posts

Surgery tomorrow at MSK

ddurvibe profile image
29 Replies

I last wrote back in July post-biopsy. My vital stats then:

-age: 57

-PSA: 5.7

-4K PSA: 18%

-MRI: possible 1cm lesion left Apex

-Targeted Biopsy: 34% positive cores. Grade 3+4. Stage T1c.

-Prolaris score 2.7 (favorable intermediate)

Since it was caught early and lower grade, gave myself 'til end of 2020 to decide on a course of action. The most worrisome aspect of the testing was from the MRI, which noted the lesion "abuts capsule". That felt like a ticking clock.

Consulted with MSK surgeons and radiologist, as well as Dr. Tewari at Mt. Sinai. I settled on Dr. Eastham at MSK because, well because of a gut feeling, as well as quality of the re-hab program with Dr. Mulhall. I think Eastham, Tewari, and Coleman are all way up there in experience and number of procedures, so it comes down to going with your own instincts and rationalizations.

It's definitely a mix of feelings, as this procedure looms closer. I feel perfectly fine and am well aware of the potential side effects I am submitting to. Why would anyone do that? Well for me, I want all those cancer cells out of my body and this seems the most direct way to do it, plus it leaves open salvage treatment options.

With multiple small foci and the 1cm lesion where it is, I'm not a great candidate for focal therapy, and the docs I spoke with universally recommended surgery given my stats.

I respect everyone's personal decision process and wish all the best in their journey.

In return, good wishes accepted. :)

Jim

Written by
ddurvibe profile image
ddurvibe
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
Read more about...
29 Replies
Tall_Allen profile image
Tall_Allen

You didn't talk to Michael Zelefsky?

ddurvibe profile image
ddurvibe in reply to Tall_Allen

Hi and thanks for the reply--I didn't talk to Dr. Zelefsky, but did consult with Dr. Mychalczak who's a radiation oncologist.

Gemlin_ profile image
Gemlin_

I think choosing surgery is a wise decision in your case. In a few month this will all just be a very bad memory.

ddurvibe profile image
ddurvibe in reply to Gemlin_

Thank you for your thoughts Gremlin.

dentaltwin profile image
dentaltwin

Good luck. I had surgery with similar numbers (though there was a suggestion of EPE on pre-op MRI, which I believe would have made me unfavorable intermediate). Also at MSKCC; my surgeon was Touijer. I used to have a psychiatrist who used Eastham. I'm doing well at 2 yrs 3 months postop. Hey, given there was no EPE on postop path--I wonder who the radiologist was--maybe the same guy. I'll have to look that up.

dentaltwin profile image
dentaltwin in reply to dentaltwin

OK--the radiologist who signed out my MRI was HEBERT VARGAS ALVAREZ

Darryl profile image
DarrylPartner

Thinking of you during tomorrow morning

Stevemart profile image
Stevemart

Good luck. Hope it goes well

Bske profile image
Bske

Good luck!My husband went same path and is doing well close to 5 years out. He had his surgery with Tewari but went to MSK post surgery because of their aftercare. He has no incontinence and pretty good sexual function. Getting past the first few weeks was hard. PSA has remained at 0.1 for the last three years. But of course I still worry.

aceace12 profile image
aceace12

good luck.....

doc1947g profile image
doc1947g

I am 73 y.o. with 50% (6/12) cores positive to higher than 80% G(4+3=7) Grade 3 Unfavourable Intermediate Risk on March 2020.Had ADT (Lupron Depot 22.5 mg/12 weeks X 2 on May 2020 + Aug 2020 and VMAT-RT 3Gy X 20Fx on June 2020.

I also have a Lymphoma LNH Marginal Zone,

Chronic Renal Insufficensy,

Severed Pulmonary Emphysema and the cherry on top of the sunday, a

Severed Depression on Sertraline 100 mg.

Now my PSA is 0.03 µg/L and Testosterone <0.2nmol/L or <0.0577µg/L or <5.7684ng/dL.

No libido, no erection and intense Hot Flashes.

But PSA = 0.03 µg/L is like if I had a RP.

Channelhomec profile image
Channelhomec

I think you will be fine you have a good team once they remove it you will have a true grad of the cancer the surgery was not all that bad make sure you understand your pathology ,report ask questions had a positive margin and in six years later savage radiation

CHPA profile image
CHPA

I felt the same 15 months ago and no regrets at all. Surgery will be fine and recover will take some time but you will love a long healthy life!

Murk profile image
Murk

I think we all like to hear your progress as you recover et, It does varry. I wish would have had them do a Decipher pathology test.

Fairway profile image
Fairway

All the best, Jim. You did your due dilligence. Procede without regret. Quincy

ddurvibe profile image
ddurvibe

Thanks to all for taking the effort to leave an encouraging word--it meant a lot. This is an incredible community.

Surgery went well according to Dr. Eastham, sounds like nerve bundles fully preserved. Five days out is early in the recovery process but am doing well. Will report back a little ways down the road when I have more info regarding pathology and healing process. Best, Jim

Murk profile image
Murk

Great news and that post pathology report which will be insightful. That Catheter was my worst experience, worse then anything else even surgery. After one week I cut that bubble off in the shower and everything just fell out. No need for a doctor visit. BTW, with this hunkered down pandemic I just kept the large big bag on and never changed.

After one week and getting that Catheter out life got better. The Incontinence lasted one week after and I donated all the diaper things to charity.

Give your self a few more weeks after that and work on your love life. I was surprised how it came back but its still not 100% after 4 months but the generic form of Viagra works great even at half dose. Your young so I bet you might experience the same.

In retrospect I actually thought that I should have my Prostate ripped out earlier. I am at a point where life is all but normal :-). The only hangover IMO is knowing that by my Hopkins Doc and others will tell you that I and now you have a 50/50 chance of the Cancer coming back. Even with clear margins and no signs of it etc, we still have a chance of reoccurrence.

ddurvibe profile image
ddurvibe in reply to Murk

Thanks for framing things in realistically positive light Murk. I'm glad you have maintained quality of life, and sounds like you still have more upside as you are only 4 months out. Who was your surgeon? I'm with you on the hang-over of potential recurrence, something to live with. Isn't that life? Things can change at any time, enjoy each day.

Cath to be self-removed tomorrow--man, I am ready. :)

Murk profile image
Murk

Just take a day at a time, relax as you can and things should get quickly better. My Urologists is Dr. Christian Pavlovich, IMO a rock star at Hopkins. The staff there are also awesome, they so often get overlooked.

ddurvibe profile image
ddurvibe in reply to Murk

Hadn't planned on updating here so soon, but had blood drawn yesterday for PSA (which seemed kinda early). The results were already up on the MyMSK portal tonight so took a look...0.65. Felt like a gut punch, esp as post-op margins and lymph nodes were negative. Yet this looks like escape. Bone scan pathologist noted one possibly "suspicious" area on hip back in July and I should have directly asked Eastham about this pre-op.

On the other hand, nothing I can do about it this weekend other than other than continue to recover and get stronger.

ddurvibe profile image
ddurvibe in reply to ddurvibe

Perhaps serum PSA is still washing out after 10 days and on its way down. Something to ask Dr. Eastham while waiting for next test. A PSA of .65 doesn't make sense given PROLARIS score, PSA <6, nomograms, post-surgical pathology.

Will check back in here in a few weeks.

Murk profile image
Murk in reply to ddurvibe

Yeah my Doc said to wait 90 days after surgery for my first basic PSA Test, your body is still adapting. Then I can wait another 90 or go 120 days before next. I am doing 90 day treks, when i doubt I play offense!

Murk profile image
Murk in reply to Murk

Oh let me add that if you want peace of mind, get a second opinion. Telemedicine calls are quick and easy.

ddurvibe profile image
ddurvibe in reply to Murk

Thanks Murk. Today they told me it was a scheduling mistake and they usually wait 6 weeks for residual PSA to clear. The nurse said given my case, they expect it to be undetectable. Wishing you the best, how great that you're at Hopkins.

Justfor_ profile image
Justfor_ in reply to ddurvibe

PSA's halving time is published to be 3-3.5 days. At the 10th day after surgery, it should had decayed to roughly the 1/8 of the pre-op value. If this was 5.7, or so, 0.65 is well within what was expected.

ddurvibe profile image
ddurvibe in reply to Justfor_

If I was more clear-headed I would have checked for a stat like halving time. Thanks for sharing that!

Murk profile image
Murk

MSK, Memorial Sloan Kettering has very high ratings so not sure what is happening to you but a second opinion could help your peace of mind. I just went for my second 90 day PSA test. I bet Tall Allen and other will recommend same maybe even when your pathology report comes have it sent for a second opinion.

When you say "Bone scan pathologist noted one possibly "suspicious" area on hip back in July" was this the full body scan? You could those results also sent out for second opinion. IMO the full body scans are not that detailed thus why they say we have a 50% chance of cancer reoccurrence. IMO don't fret, play offense talk to more people.

I hope others more informed and experienced then me chime in here.

ddurvibe profile image
ddurvibe in reply to Murk

Thanks for your thoughts here Murk. I would certainly ask about PSMA PET scan or equivalent, but god-willing will not be necessary.

ddurvibe profile image
ddurvibe

Quick update now seven weeks out from surgery. Going to first post-op visit with Dr. Eastham tomorrow. Latest PSA is <.05, no continence issues, erection quality now gets to around 7/10 on 100mg of Sildenafil, trend is good. Very thankful for where I am at this point in recovery, and for the quality of treatment and care received from the MSK team.

The post-surgical pathology confirmed Gleason 3+4 with grade 4 being 10%, and tumor involved 10% of the prostate. Negative margins, no lymph node involvement, no ECE. The one new thing I saw on that report was "perineural invasion identified", and the staging went from T1c to T2. Guessing my odds for biochemical recurrence in coming years got a little bit worse? Will have to revisit the nomogram.

The operative report also noted "right accessory pudendal artery not preserved". Is this common? Googling that you get to read about redundant blood flow pathways into the penis and can blood vessels can be removed without a significant impact on functionality. Intend to further inquire about this area tomorrow with Eastham.

This paragraph has a few more intimate urological details, skip it if you like, but want to share so people can better make their own decisions about treatment and side effects. Months ago, I asked Dr. Eastham about the side effect of penis shrinkage during my initial consult with him, with my wild ass assumption being the urethra resection was the culprit. He waved that off an said basically its due to changes in blood flow. Maybe that's why my eye caught the "pudendal artery" notation in the report. I can verify current changes to flaccid size similar to what you might have after an intense workout when blood flood down there isn't a priority for the body. The little guy has been through some surgical (but hopefully well-managed) trauma. Hoping blood flow, as with nerve function, will improve over time, especially with rehab and lots of "attention", somewhat similar to skeletal muscle. As far as dry orgasm--check, but it's an still orgasm. Actually not completely dry, I might still emit pre-cum or urine, but the latter is minimal and seems controllable as I get more used to the nuances of this new functionality. Will update in a few months.

In the big scheme of things, I feel great that the cancer has been treated and I can get back to the gym, plan for the future, and worry about other things. I'm thankful this board exists and and for the good people here who share their knowledge and support.

Jim

You may also like...

My MSK Precise / SBRT Journey -- Treatment #5

Well, I am happy to say, I had my fifth and final SBRT treatment at MSK in NYC on 11/15. It was a...

My MSK Precise / SBRT Journey Begins

cancer with MSK's version of SBRT called \\"MSK Precise\\" -- My doctor for this procedure is Dr....

Started MRI Guided SBRT at MSK

4+3 (Unfavorable Intermediate Risk) and I needed definitive treatment. I opted for MRI guided SBRT...

My MSK Precise / SBRT Journey -- Treatment #1

going to begin. It all was very much akin to an MRI machine experience except that the machine was...

My MSK Precise / SBRT Journey -- Four Months Post Treatment

treatment in November 2021. My current PSA reading is 4.8 -- My PSA reading right before treatment...